Harris should have won the Debate!

Comparing Kamala Harris and Donald Trump involves assessing their leadership styles, policy positions, and personal qualities in the context of what different people may prioritize in a leader. Some find Harris's approach to be more unifying and policy-driven, while others might favor Trump’s populist appeal and direct communication. Here’s a look at how Harris's approach to governance, experience, and personal values might appeal to voters who prefer stability, inclusivity, and progress over disruption and divisiveness.

1. Experience in Governance and Public Service

Kamala Harris has built her career in public service over the course of nearly two decades. As a district attorney in San Francisco, attorney general of California, and then U.S. senator, Harris has substantial experience in navigating complex policy issues, particularly on criminal justice reform, consumer rights, and public health. Her time as a U.S. senator gave her legislative experience, including work on key committees like Homeland Security, Intelligence, and Judiciary. These roles required collaboration across party lines and deep policy understanding.

Trump’s background is primarily in business, and he had no prior political or public service experience before his presidency. This made him an unconventional leader, which some admired as a “fresh approach,” but it also led to criticisms about his lack of understanding in diplomatic relations and the functions of government. Harris's extensive experience means she’s more accustomed to the intricacies of policy and collaboration, which may lend itself to more stability and fewer divisive policy swings.

2. Approach to Leadership

Harris emphasizes collaboration and often seeks to build coalitions across the political spectrum, as well as with other countries. For example, she has led diplomatic missions and engaged in international talks to address global issues such as immigration and climate change. Her approach to leadership is more measured, prioritizing careful consideration and long-term planning. Harris has also emphasized her commitment to democratic norms and institutions, aiming to uphold the values of transparency and accountability.

Trump’s leadership style has been widely described as populist and assertive, often driven by his personal beliefs rather than established norms. He appealed to his base by positioning himself as an outsider, frequently challenging the political establishment and mainstream media. However, his approach has been criticized for fostering division. His dismissal of international alliances and preference for a more insular approach sometimes strained relations with traditional allies. Harris’s style of leadership, in contrast, may appeal to those who prefer stability, diplomacy, and inclusivity in addressing both domestic and global challenges.

3. Policy on Social and Economic Issues

Harris's policy positions tend to align with progressive and moderate Democrats, emphasizing economic fairness, healthcare access, and social equity. She advocates for raising the minimum wage, expanding access to affordable healthcare, and addressing systemic racism. As vice president, she has supported initiatives that promote middle-class growth.

Donald J. Trump is the projected winner of the 2024 U.S. presidential election according to multiple news sources. For the most up-to-date information about the U.S. Election, please visit news sources like The Associated Press and Reuters, or check with your state or local election authority.

We can say that Trump has his thing going on right now, we do not care about. All a have to say next is that my perspective as an European is far from the same as someone that is more into American political stuff.

Here are more images of Kamala Harris and Mr. Trump:

During Trump’s presidency, the U.S. experienced significant economic growth before the COVID-19 pandemic. Proponents cite job creation, tax cuts, and regulatory rollbacks as reasons for a strong economy.

The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 reduced corporate tax rates, which supporters argue spurred business investments and economic expansion.

His focus on renegotiating trade deals, such as the USMCA (United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement), is viewed as a victory for American workers.