After all, it is up to the China people to define Democracy for themselves

I watched a video of a conversation between Victor Gao and Mehdi Hasan on China Uyghur's human rights and Xi’s dictatorship. It took place on August 10th.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kmYdpHtOv_E

And it really brings me so many thoughts. I will discuss them one by one, in the order they were discussed in the video.

The first thought that comes to mind is: what gives a foreigner the right to question the China government?

The Taiwan problem was the first topic they discussed. Hasan asked why China shouldn't just leave Taiwan as it is. Hmmm... that's interesting. What has the China Communist Party done now? Did they invade Taiwan? No. China has allowed Taiwan to remain as it is. On the contrary, it’s Taiwan that keeps provoking China.

As for the unpopular rate of One China policy among Taiwanese, and for the people who don’t want to be part of China, well, China wants Taiwan, the land of Taiwan and the Taiwan people who recognize them as China people, not those who recognize themselves as Japanese or whatever thing they think they are.

Unpopular? I totally understand. When a homeowner wants their house back from guests, it's reasonable that the guests don't want to leave. That's why the host is now persuading them. Why China is using persuasion instead of force: the guests' identities are unclear. They could be family, in which case they are also the owners of the house. But they could also be invaders, in which case they must be expelled without hesitation.

It is difficult for Westerners to understand, but the property does not belong to a robber who slaughtered the owner of the house. However, when the owner extinct, it does make it easier for the robber to pretend they’re the actual owner. White Americans and White Australians should be very familiar with this conspiracy.

But if the Westerners thought they could make this plot work again in Taiwan, they’re wrong. The owner did not extinct!

I should also mention that, in case Westerners ignore the obvious truth, the China government never forces anyone to remain Chinese. If someone wants to forget their roots and ancestors, it's a relief for all China people to see them getting away. Non-China people cannot occupy China people’s houses, that’s all.

I think that, in terms of the disregard shown for Taiwanese views, freedom and dignity, mainland China has been extremely tolerant of Taiwan, allowing such a small island shitting and pissing all over China.

If Taiwan didn’t share the same origins as mainland China, China would not be so tolerant. In other words, if any small country provoked China in the same way that Taiwan has, China would teach them how to respect a great power, as it did with Lithuania.

What else can Taiwan expect? You spit on me and expect me to compliment you?

As for Gao's suggestion of removing the Taiwan people of Japanese origin who still recognise themselves as Japanese, what reason is there for an owner to tolerate invaders who massacred 300,000 of their compatriots? Who do you think you’re talking to? The Virgin Mary?

When speaking about the Chinese people's attitude towards the Japanese, keep in mind that you’re talking to survivors of the Nanjing Massacre and the Unit 731 human vivisection experiments! And you dare to question China's possible and mild expulsion of the Japanese?

Are you human?

What's wrong with expelling invaders who have massacred millions of China people? Just because they invaded and lived in this country for decades? This is the first time I knew that, for Westerners, time was a justification for war crimes and ethnic cleansing.

Perhaps they can empathise with the Japanese. After all, time has given Britain the right to keep all the loot they plundered during their invasions around the world.