I found this on Facebook,it was published by me in 2011.
I have to say, my thoughts my ideas and everything is different now.
Let see how 20 year old me compares to 28 turning 29 (Birthday Coming soon) year old me.
(29 year old me answers in parenthesis and underlined)
Name: Angie (Angel Is my Nickname)
Age: 20 (28)
Birthday: may 5 (same lol)
WHAT WAS YOUR:
1. last beverage -water (tea)
2. last phone call - dad (sister)
3. last text message - dad (sister)
4. last song you listened too – stand in the rain ( Loco Amor)
5. last time I cried – yesterday (a week ago)
HAVE YOU EVER:
6. dated someone twice - yep ( same)
7. been cheated on - yep (same)
8. kissed someone & regretted it – yea a yr ago (Well same person.)
9. lost someone special - yea (too many)
10. been depressed – not at the moment (Same)
11. been drunk and threw up – nah (yup ,about 2 years ago)
LIST THREE FAVORITE COLORS:
12. purple (green)
13. Red (same)
14. Black (same)
LAST YEAR (2010), HAVE YOU:
15. Made a new friend - always (still always)
16. Fallen out of love – nvr been inlove (yes twice)
17. Laughed until you cried – yup lol (for sure)
18. Met someone who changed you – no (yes)
19. Found out who your true friends were – yea i did (Yes)
20. Found out someone was talking about you -yea (too many)
21. Kissed anyone on your FB friend's list - none (same)
GENERAL:
22. How many people on your FB friends list do you know in real life – about 200 (320)
24. Do you have any pets - none (nope)
25. Do you want to change your name - Nope (Maybe the last name.)
26. What did you do for your last birthday - nothing (To see my family.)
27. What time did you wake up today – 8:20 (7am)
28. What were you doing at midnight last night – talking on the phone (same)
29. Name something you CANNOT wait for- my phone (For my birthday to come and be over with.)
30. Last time you saw your mother – 1 yr 3 weeks and 3 days ago (1 year and 5 months ago.)
31. What is one thing you wish you could change about your life - secret(Still Secret)
32. What are you listening to right now -hyperlinks (For your Glory)
33. Have you ever talked to a person named Tom? – once n nvr again (Have like 3 friends name Tom.)
34. What's getting on your nerves right now? - this (Quarantine)
35. Most visited webpage - fb (Asl lessons)
36. Who do you most admire? – still deciding (God)
37. Nickname – tinker bell, dark angel , little monkey (Mousy,hey you,Angel)
38. Relationship Status - secret (Single)
39. Zodiac sign - taurus (Same)
40. He or She – she duh (She,same)
41. Elementary School – too many (same)
42. High School- too many (same)
43. College - Brown Mackie (Already graduated years ago)
44. Hair- almost dark blonde (Black)
45. Long or short - short (same)
46. Height – 5’1" (same lol, wait let me put my heels on.)
47. Do you have a crush on someone? - yup (no)
48. What do you like about yourself? - my eyes (same)
49. Piercings - Ears (Nothing)
50. Tattoos - none (4)
51. Righty or lefty - righty (same)
FIRSTS:
52. First kiss – hated it a yr ago (Same)
53. First piercing - my ears (same)
54. First best friend - Angel (Same)
55. First sport you joined –volley ball (same)
56. First vacation –Puerto Rico (same)
RIGHT NOW:
59. Eating - noting (seaweed snacks)
60. Drinking - noting(tea)
61. I'm about to – erase all of this (sleep)
62. Listening to - hyperlinks (Really Again I already said it-For Your Glory)
63. Waiting for – my paper to be done (My Tofu to cook.)
YOUR FUTURE:
64.Want Kids?- ask me in 4 yrs (Yes,but everything in God timing.)
65. Get Married? –ask me im a yr (Again God time,not my.)
66. Career? - entertainer (Teacher)
WHICH IS BETTER :
67. Lips or eyes – Eyes but mostly both (Eyes)
68. Hugs or kisses – both why choose (Hugs)
69. Shorter or taller - TALL (same)
70. Older or Young – young 1 yr old 2 yr limit (same)
71. Romantic or spontaneous – both cant choose (Romantic)
72. Nice stomach or nice arms – both cant choose (Arms)
73. Sensitive or loud - sensitive (same)
74. Hook-up or relationship - Relationship (same)
75. Trouble maker or hesitant - hesitant (same)
HAVE YOU EVER
76. Kissed a stranger -none (Same)
77. Drank hard liquor - nope (Years ago)
78. Lost glasses/contacts - yea (same)
79. Sex on first date - nope (Marriage first)
80. Broke someone's heart - yea (same)
81. Had your own heart broken – yup (same)
82. Been arrested- Never (same)
84. Cried when someone died – if they wer close to me (Omg my spelling, and still yes ,specially If I admire them too.)
85. Fallen for a friend - once (Never Again)
DO YOU BELIEVE IN:
86. Yourself – all depends (Yes)
87. Miracles - yes (same)
88. Love at first sight - yea (Not Really)
89. Heaven - yea (Same, that's the goal!)
90. Santa Claus – nope hes a perve (Im about to turn 29 ,NOOOO!)
91. Kiss on the first date - yea (N0)
92. Angels - yea (Same)
About the Creator
Angel Pagan
I am a novice at writing ,but a passion of mine it is. It drives me to better myself,to help others and to make you have a laugh. I am in my late 20's,driven and I love to work. I love to play my instruments and learn new languages.
Keep reading
More stories from Angel Pagan and writers in Humans and other communities.
Star Hill Diner
The fight between two souls that want to be together is real. Through time and space. Many life opportunities and incarnations. Just to look for each other again and just don't remember. That one person that when you see them, you know already that somehow, someway you see and feel and know their thoughts. That spark that activates and after that there is no way to even be apart. I've been there, I have seen it.
By Angel Pagan5 years ago in Humans
Lost and Alone in the French Alps
Looking back, I can trace some of my life’s biggest adventures to a simple action from my sister. She’d introduced me to Tommy (a very long time ago), a colleague of hers, who had overshared his penchant for Italian-looking women, and I ticked that box.
By Chantal Christie Weiss20 days ago in Humans
Los Angeles Billionaire Moves to Nevada After California Threatens to Tax Wealth
When a prominent Los Angeles billionaire quietly packed up and moved to Nevada, it wasn’t just a personal lifestyle change — it was a political statement. The move came shortly after California lawmakers revived proposals to tax extreme wealth, targeting the state’s richest residents as a way to fund public services and address inequality. Now, that single relocation has become a symbol in a much larger debate: Do wealth taxes strengthen states — or drive their most valuable taxpayers away? The Trigger: California’s Wealth Tax Proposal California has long wrestled with how to fund its ambitious social programs while addressing widening income inequality. In recent years, progressive lawmakers have floated proposals to introduce a wealth tax, aimed at individuals with net worths above a certain threshold — often tens or hundreds of millions of dollars. Unlike income taxes, which apply to yearly earnings, wealth taxes target accumulated assets such as stocks, real estate, and business holdings. Supporters argue that this approach ensures the ultra-rich contribute a fairer share to public infrastructure, education, and housing. Critics, however, warn that wealth taxes are difficult to enforce and easy to avoid, especially in a mobile economy where residency can shift across state lines. The Los Angeles billionaire’s move appears to validate those concerns. Why Nevada? Nevada has become a magnet for wealthy individuals — and the reasons are straightforward. The state has: No personal income tax No capital gains tax Business-friendly regulations A growing financial and tech services sector For high-net-worth individuals, relocating to Nevada can mean saving millions of dollars annually. For someone facing the possibility of a wealth tax layered on top of California’s already high income taxes, the financial incentive is hard to ignore. In this case, the billionaire reportedly established legal residency in Nevada, purchased property, and shifted business operations — all steps that tax experts say are increasingly common among ultra-wealthy Californians. A Broader Trend, Not an Isolated Case This move is far from unique. Over the past decade, California has seen a steady outflow of wealthy residents to states like Nevada, Texas, Florida, and Arizona. While climate, housing costs, and lifestyle play roles, tax policy has become a central factor. High-profile departures — from tech executives to hedge fund managers — often spark political backlash. Critics argue that the wealthy are abandoning the state that helped them succeed. Defenders counter that states should not penalize success to fund unsustainable spending. The Los Angeles billionaire’s relocation has once again brought this tension into the spotlight. The Political Reaction in California California lawmakers defending the wealth tax proposal insist that fear of capital flight is exaggerated. They argue that the state’s economic advantages — including access to talent, innovation hubs, and cultural influence — outweigh tax concerns for most entrepreneurs. Some lawmakers also point out that California already relies heavily on its highest earners, with a small percentage of taxpayers contributing a large share of total revenue. In their view, asking the ultra-rich to contribute more is not radical — it’s necessary. Opponents, however, see the billionaire’s move as a warning sign. They argue that when even a single wealthy individual leaves, the state can lose not only tax revenue but also investment, philanthropy, and job creation. What This Means for State Finances The departure of one billionaire may not immediately dent California’s massive budget, but the long-term implications are harder to ignore. Wealthy individuals often: Pay a disproportionate share of state taxes Fund startups and venture capital Support universities, museums, and nonprofits If enough high-net-worth residents follow the same path, critics warn, the tax base could shrink faster than lawmakers expect. Supporters of the wealth tax counter that public investment funded by higher taxes could improve quality of life for millions — potentially attracting new residents and businesses in the long run. A National Debate Over Wealth and Mobility This story extends beyond California. Across the U.S., states are competing for residents — especially wealthy ones. Tax policy has become one of the most powerful tools in that competition. While progressive states push for redistribution, low-tax states market themselves as havens for capital. The Los Angeles billionaire’s move underscores a key reality of modern economics: wealth is increasingly mobile. Assets can move digitally, businesses can relocate headquarters, and individuals can change residency with relative ease. This mobility complicates efforts to tax extreme wealth at the state level, fueling calls for federal solutions instead. The Ethical Divide At the heart of the controversy lies a philosophical question: Should wealthy individuals feel a moral obligation to remain and pay higher taxes in the states that enabled their success — or are they justified in seeking the most favorable financial environment? Supporters of wealth taxes argue that extreme inequality threatens social stability and that those who benefit most from the system should help sustain it. Opponents argue that punitive taxation discourages innovation and rewards capital flight, ultimately harming the very communities lawmakers aim to help. The billionaire’s move doesn’t settle the debate — but it sharpens it. What Happens Next? California’s wealth tax proposals are still evolving, and it remains unclear whether a final version will pass. Even if enacted, legal challenges and enforcement hurdles loom large. Meanwhile, states like Nevada are likely to continue benefiting from California’s policy uncertainty, attracting wealthy residents and businesses seeking predictability. For policymakers, the challenge is balancing fairness, revenue needs, and competitiveness in a system where borders are increasingly porous. Final Thoughts The Los Angeles billionaire’s move to Nevada is more than a headline — it’s a case study in how tax policy shapes behavior. It highlights the difficulty of taxing wealth at the state level and the unintended consequences that can follow even well-intentioned reforms. As California debates its economic future, one thing is clear: in a mobile, interconnected economy, policy decisions don’t just redistribute wealth — they redirect it. Whether wealth taxes become a solution or a cautionary tale will depend on how lawmakers respond to the signals already being sent.
By Muhammad Hassan4 days ago in Humans
Ludacris and Nelly draw backlash over bookings at MAGA-coded music festival
Ludacris and Nelly headlining a mostly right-wing event is good for them. It’s also great for the genre of hip hop. The two rap veterans have showcased their talents on other stages. Why can’t they perform for mostly MAGA folks and grab that bag?
By Skyler Saunders5 days ago in Beat
Comments
There are no comments for this story
Be the first to respond and start the conversation.