10 worst jobs

In this world no one is satisfied with their jobs or work. At least they have 1% unsatisfied with their jobs. so all the people has some fear, confusion and lot of stress in their jobs. So this article is surely help for those people. The reason is history has so many worst jobs. the jobs is filled with anxious ,tough, lot of difficulties so only people getting fear with their jobs. In this article we going to see 10 worst jobs in history.

1., Nomenclator:

A nomenclator was a slave whose job it was to remember the names of those his master met when running for office. The word nomenclator (/nomn.kletr/ NOH-mn-KLAY-tr; English plural nomenclators, Latin plural nomenclatores) originated in classical times. Later, this expanded to encompass other socially significant information as well as names of persons in any social environment. In another word nomenclator is a job of one person slave to his master. For example the slave person went everywhere with his master, at that time some persons convey some information to the master, the slave has to keep the information in his mind because next time the slave has to remind the information to the master when he need. this is nomenclator. he is like a reminder.

2.,Sin eater:

A sin eater was a person in medieval and early modern Europe who was believed to take on the sins of a deceased person in order to absolve them of their guilt and ensure their passage into the afterlife. The practice of sin eating was typically performed during a funeral ceremony and involved the sin eater consuming food, usually bread, placed on the chest of the deceased.

The belief in sin eating was rooted in the idea that a person's soul could not enter heaven if they had committed certain sins, and that a sin eater could absolve them of these sins by taking them on themselves. This practice was especially common among poor and rural communities, where there was often a lack of access to priests or other religious leaders who could perform absolution.

Sin eaters were typically marginalized members of society, such as beggars or the homeless, and they were often seen as outcasts. They were believed to have special powers or abilities, and they were sometimes even feared by their communities.

The practice of sin eating fell out of use as the Catholic Church became more dominant in Europe and emphasized the importance of confession and absolution through the sacrament of penance. The church also sought to eradicate what it saw as superstitions and false beliefs, including sin eating, and the practice was eventually discredited and disappeared.

In conclusion, the sin eater was a historical figure who played a role in the beliefs and rituals of medieval and early modern Europe. While the practice of sin eating is no longer widely believed or practiced, it remains an interesting and somewhat mysterious part of European cultural history.

3., whipping boy:

A whipping boy was a person in medieval and early modern Europe who was punished in place of a prince or other high-ranking individual. The practice was most commonly used as a form of punishment for young royalty, who were often protected from physical punishment by their royal status.

The idea behind the use of a whipping boy was that the prince would form an attachment to the whipping boy and would therefore be reluctant to misbehave, for fear of putting their friend in danger. When the prince did misbehave, he would be punished by having the whipping boy beaten in his place.

Whipping boys were typically selected from among the lower classes, and they were often the sons of servants or other poor individuals. They were often selected because they were of similar age and social status to the prince they were to serve, and they were sometimes raised alongside the prince as companions.

The practice of using whipping boys fell out of use in the 17th century, as the idea of physical punishment for misbehavior became less acceptable and other forms of punishment, such as fines or imprisonment, became more widely used.

In conclusion, the whipping boy was a historical figure who played a role in the punishment of young royalty in medieval and early modern Europe. While the practice of using whipping boys is no longer in use, it remains an interesting and somewhat unusual aspect of European history.

4., Soap making:

History says in Europe people manufactured soap using dead animal skin, fat and some perfumes. Soap making has been a common occupation throughout history, and has played an important role in personal hygiene, health, and commerce. Soap is a product made from fats or oils and an alkali, such as lye, which reacts with the fats to create a substance that is effective in cleaning and removing grease and dirt from skin and clothing.

Soap making can be traced back to ancient civilizations, such as Babylon, where evidence of soap making has been found on clay tablets dating back to 2800 BCE. In Europe, soap making became a well-established industry by the Middle Ages, with soap makers guilds forming in cities such as Paris, Venice, and London. Soap was often made in large quantities, with the raw materials, including animal fats and wood ash, being sourced from local communities.

As the demand for soap grew, so did the production methods, and by the 19th century, soap making had become a highly industrialized process. New technologies, such as the steam engine and chemical processes, allowed for the large-scale production of soap, and new types of soap, such as medicated soaps, were developed to meet specific needs.

Soap making continues to be an important industry today, with soap being manufactured on a global scale and sold in many different forms, including bar soap, liquid soap, and soap flakes. The industry has also become increasingly specialized, with soap makers offering a range of products for specific skin types, fragrances, and purposes.

5., body snatcher:

A body snatcher, also known as a resurrectionist, was a person in the 18th and 19th centuries who stole bodies from graves for use in medical anatomy schools and dissection clinics. At the time, there was a shortage of cadavers for medical study, and the only legal supply of bodies came from executions and the poorhouses. As a result, many medical schools turned to the illegal trade in bodies, and body snatching became a lucrative business for those who were willing to engage in it.

Body snatching was often carried out at night, and the thieves would dig up freshly buried bodies and sell them to medical schools or anatomists. The bodies were usually dismembered and used for dissection and other medical purposes. The practice was highly unethical and often seen as a desecration of the dead, and it was widely condemned by religious and social groups.

In response to the public outcry, laws were enacted in many countries to regulate the use of cadavers in medical schools and to limit the trade in bodies. Cadavers were also obtained from other sources, such as anatomy bequests and donations, which helped to reduce the demand for body snatching.

In conclusion, body snatching was a dark and unethical chapter in the history of medicine, and it was a direct result of the shortage of cadavers for medical study in the 18th and 19th centuries. The practice was widely condemned and eventually regulated by laws, and it has now been largely eradicated. Body snatching remains an interesting and sometimes disturbing aspect of medical history, and it serves as a reminder of the importance of ethical and responsible use of human remains for scientific and medical purposes.

6., Fulling:

Fulling, also known as tucking or walking (Scots: waukin; frequently spelled waulking in Scottish English), is a step in the production of woollen clothing that involves cleaning woven fabric, especially wool, to remove (lanoline) oils, dirt, and other impurities as well as shrinking it through friction and pressure. Some slave people collect wool and store it in box then they went to every roman homes, and public toilet for collecting urine. they purchased urine from urine people. this shows urine also demand in history for money. then the slaves mix both urine and wool in same box. so the fat gets separate. The project results in a smooth, neatly finished fabric that is waterproof and insulating. Loden, which was produced in Austria beginning in the 16th century, and duffel cloth, which was first produced in Flanders in the 14th century, are two well-known examples.

The hands and feet might both be used for waulking. It was carried out in fulling mills driven by water in mediaeval Europe. Coal and electricity were utilized following the industrial revolution.

In a broader sense, felting refers to the tangle-free weaving together of loose wool strands.

7., Leech collector:

A leech collector was a person who collected and sold leeches, which were commonly used in medical treatments during the 19th and early 20th centuries. Leeches were considered an important tool in the field of medicine, and they were widely used for bloodletting, a practice that was believed to balance the four humors and restore good health.

Leech collectors often worked in rural areas, near marshes and ponds, where leeches could be found in abundance. They would collect the leeches by wading into the water and allowing the leeches to attach to their legs, and then they would remove the leeches and place them in containers for transport. The leeches were usually sold to apothecaries, who would then sell them to doctors and hospitals for use in medical treatments.

As the demand for leeches increased, leech collecting became an important industry, and it was estimated that at its peak, the trade in leeches was worth millions of dollars. However, the use of leeches in medicine declined in the 20th century, as new treatments and technologies were developed, and the industry eventually died out.

In conclusion, the leech collector was a historical figure who played a role in the trade of leeches, which were used in medical treatments during the 19th and early 20th centuries. The use of leeches in medicine has now largely been discredited, and the industry of leech collecting is no longer in existence. The leech collector is an interesting aspect of medical history, and it serves as a reminder of the evolution of medical treatments and practices over time.

8., leather tanner:

A leather tanner was a person who was involved in the process of converting animal hides into leather. This was an important trade in many societies throughout history, as leather was used for a wide range of purposes, including clothing, footwear, saddles, harnesses, and tents.

The leather tanning process typically involved several stages, including soaking the hides in a mixture of water and salts to remove any impurities, and then soaking them in a solution of tannins, which is derived from tree bark, leaves, or other plant materials. The tannins would penetrate the hides and help to preserve them, making them more durable and resistant to decay. After the hides had been treated with tannins, they would be dried, stretched, and finished to produce a soft, pliable leather that was ready for use.

Leather tanners often worked in small shops or in larger factories, and they typically used a combination of traditional techniques and modern tools to produce leather. They also used a variety of chemicals, including chromium and other minerals, to produce different types of leather with specific properties and finishes.

In conclusion, the leather tanner was an important figure in many societies throughout history, as leather was a versatile and essential material that was used for a wide range of purposes. The trade of leather tanning involved a combination of traditional techniques and modern tools, and it was an important part of the industrial and economic development of many societies. Today, leather tanning is still an important industry, although much of it has become automated and specialized, and the traditional role of the leather tanner has diminished.

9., French beggars :

French beggars, or "les mendicants," were a common sight in France from the Middle Ages to the modern era. Begging was a widespread phenomenon in France, and it was often seen as a result of poverty and social inequality. In the Middle Ages, begging was regulated by the church and the state, and many beggars were forced to live in poverty and suffer from various diseases.

In the 17th and 18th centuries, the situation for beggars in France worsened, as the country experienced several economic and political crises. Many people were forced to beg for food and shelter, and the streets were filled with beggars who lived in poverty and disease. Despite this, there were some attempts to improve the situation of beggars, and many religious and charitable organizations were established to help the poor and the homeless.

In the 19th and 20th centuries, the situation for beggars in France improved somewhat, as the country underwent several social and economic changes. The government introduced several reforms that aimed to alleviate poverty and improve the living standards of the poor, and the number of beggars declined. Nevertheless, poverty and social inequality persisted in France, and beggars continued to be a common sight in many parts of the country.

In conclusion, French beggars were a common sight in France from the Middle Ages to the modern era, and they were a reflection of the poverty and social inequality that existed in the country. Despite attempts to improve the situation of beggars, poverty and social inequality persisted, and French beggars remained a common sight in many parts of the country. The history of French beggars is an interesting aspect of the social and economic history of France, and it serves as a reminder of the ongoing challenge of addressing poverty and social inequality in modern society.

10., Groom of the Stool :

The most private of an English monarch's courtiers, the Groom of the Stool assisted the king with excretion and hygiene. His formal title was "Groom of the King's Close Stool."

His transformation into a man in whom his royal master had great faith and with whom numerous royal secrets were routinely disclosed as a result of the physical intimacy of the job. The fact that he knew this knowledge was top-secret—which he would never have shared since doing so would have damaged his reputation—made him more feared, respected, and powerful within the royal court. The Groom of the Stool became a significant official involved in establishing national fiscal policy under Henry VII, and the position progressively evolved over decades and centuries into one of administration of the royal funds.

The position was afterwards dubbed Groom of the Stole. David Starkey, a Tudor historian, categorizes this change as a classic example of Victorianism: "When the Victorians came to look at this office, they spelled it s-t-o-l-e, and imagined all kinds of fictions about elaborate robes draped around the neck of the monarch at the coronation". In reality, the change dates back to the 17th century.