A Teacher’s Revenge: Dronacharya’s Test of Loyalty and the Capture of King Drupada
The stroy of battle between drupada and the kuru princes
Drona’s Friendship with Drupada and the Broken Promise
Long before he became the revered teacher of the Pandavas and Kauravas, Dronacharya had a close friendship with Drupada, the prince of the kingdom of Panchala. They had studied together as young boys, trained under the same teachers, and shared a deep, brotherly bond. Drupada, admiring Drona’s skill and knowledge, had once promised him, “When I become king, half of my kingdom will be yours. Together, we will rule as friends, sharing wealth and power.”
However, life took them down different paths. Drupada ascended the throne of Panchala and became a powerful king, while Drona led a life of simplicity as a Brahmin. His wife, Kripi, and son, Ashwatthama, lived modestly, and Drona struggled to provide for his family. When his son, Ashwatthama, expressed a desire for milk, a simple but unaffordable luxury, Drona was filled with a sense of helplessness and shame. Remembering Drupada’s promise, he decided to seek his friend’s help, confident that Drupada would honor their past friendship.
However, when Drona arrived at Drupada’s court, he was met with a harsh reality. Drupada, now a king, dismissed Drona’s request, laughing at his claim of friendship. Drupada told him, “Friendship exists only among equals, Drona. You are a poor Brahmin, while I am a king. The friendship of our youth holds no meaning today.” Drupada’s rejection and scorn shattered Drona’s heart. Humiliated and filled with resentment, he left Panchala, vowing to one day take revenge for this insult.
Dronacharya’s Role as the Royal Preceptor
Eventually, Drona found his way to Hastinapura, where he demonstrated his archery skills before the Kuru princes and was appointed as the royal preceptor by Bhishma. Drona trained both the Pandavas and the Kauravas in warfare, archery, and the principles of dharma, becoming a respected and admired figure in the kingdom. He formed a close bond with his students, especially Arjuna, who demonstrated unwavering dedication to his training.
Though Drona was a devoted teacher, the memory of Drupada’s insult lingered in his mind. He waited for an opportunity to reclaim his dignity and make Drupada pay for his arrogance. As his students grew stronger and more skilled, Drona realized he now had the means to fulfill his vow of revenge.
The Request to Capture Drupada
One day, after a rigorous training session, Drona gathered his students and made a unique request. He reminded them of their duty to serve and honor their teacher and then revealed his own story, sharing the tale of his friendship with Drupada and the humiliation he suffered. He explained how Drupada’s scorn had wounded him and how he longed to regain his dignity.
Drona then asked his students for a favor: to capture Drupada, bring him to Hastinapura, and offer him as a captive to Drona. The request was not only a test of their loyalty but also an opportunity for Drona to fulfill his unresolved promise to himself. The princes, especially the Kauravas, saw this as an exciting challenge, eager to prove their skills to their teacher.
The Kauravas, led by Duryodhana, were the first to attempt the mission. They marched to Panchala with an army, confident in their strength and superiority. However, Drupada, a seasoned warrior with his own army, quickly defeated the Kauravas. Humiliated and defeated, they returned to Hastinapura, unable to fulfill Drona’s request.
Arjuna’s Victory and Capture of Drupada
Seeing the failure of the Kauravas, Drona turned to his favored student, Arjuna. Arjuna accepted the challenge with humility, assembling a smaller, more strategic force that included his brothers, the Pandavas. They approached Panchala, and with Arjuna’s tactical prowess and skill, they succeeded in breaking through Drupada’s defenses.
Arjuna confronted Drupada on the battlefield and, after a fierce but honorable fight, captured him. Drupada, surprised and humbled, was taken back to Hastinapura as a captive. When he was presented before Drona, he realized the depth of Drona’s resolve and the loyalty of Drona’s students.
Drona’s Revenge and Final Act of Forgiveness
Dronacharya, now with Drupada as his captive, reminded him of his broken promise and the humiliation he had endured. Drupada, recognizing his mistake and the arrogance that had clouded his judgment, admitted his wrongdoing. In a gesture that balanced justice with mercy, Drona forgave Drupada but took half of his kingdom, thus fulfilling Drupada’s childhood promise. He returned the other half to Drupada, ensuring that they were now equals.
This act of forgiveness and balance demonstrated Drona’s wisdom. Though he had sought revenge, he understood the importance of dharma and magnanimity. By allowing Drupada to retain half his kingdom, Drona symbolically restored their bond as equals, if not as friends.
The Consequences of the Capture
Drupada’s defeat planted seeds of resentment and rivalry. Determined to avenge his defeat, Drupada performed a sacrificial ritual (yajna) to obtain a son who would one day kill Drona. From this ritual, he was blessed with Dhrishtadyumna, a powerful warrior destined to become Drona’s eventual slayer, and Draupadi, the princess who would marry the Pandavas and play a significant role in the Mahabharata.
About the Creator
Keep reading
More stories from sai Charan and writers in History and other communities.
The Test of Valor: Arjuna’s Rescue of Dronacharya from the Crocodile
The bond between Arjuna, the third Pandava, and his teacher Dronacharya was forged through many moments of dedication, discipline, and respect. Dronacharya, a master archer and warrior, saw exceptional potential in Arjuna and decided to guide him toward becoming the finest archer of his time. To accomplish this, Drona would often test Arjuna’s skills, loyalty, and courage in various ways, pushing him to reach new heights in his training. One such test came in the form of a life-threatening challenge involving a crocodile, a moment that showcased Arjuna’s courage and quick thinking.
By sai Charanabout a year ago in History
T.S. Eliot – The Poet of a Broken World
In the autumn of 1888, in the city of St. Louis, Missouri, a boy named Thomas Stearns Eliot was born into a respectable and thoughtful family. His father was a successful businessman, and his mother, Charlotte, was a teacher and a poet. From an early age, young Thomas—who would later be known to the world simply as T.S. Eliot—grew up surrounded by books, ideas, and quiet discipline. St. Louis, resting beside the Mississippi River, was a city of movement and trade. Yet Eliot was not drawn to noise or crowds. He was a quiet child, often reading alone. He suffered from a double hernia as a boy, which limited his physical activities. While other children played rough games, Eliot stayed indoors, exploring literature and philosophy. In many ways, this isolation shaped his inner world. He learned to observe deeply and to think carefully—qualities that would later define his poetry. As a young man, Eliot attended Harvard University. There, he studied philosophy, literature, and languages. He became fascinated with French poets like Charles Baudelaire and Jules Laforgue. From them, he learned how poetry could express the confusion and complexity of modern life. He also studied ancient texts, Sanskrit, and Eastern philosophy. These influences would later appear in his most famous works. After Harvard, Eliot traveled to Paris to study at the Sorbonne. Europe was changing rapidly. The old traditions were fading, and new ideas were rising. Eliot felt drawn to this shifting world. Eventually, he moved to England in 1914, just as World War I began. It was a time of uncertainty and fear. The war shook Europe to its core, and many people felt that civilization itself was breaking apart. In London, Eliot struggled at first. He worked as a teacher and later as a clerk in a bank. The job was dull and exhausting, but it paid the bills. At the same time, he continued writing poetry in his spare hours. In 1915, he married Vivienne Haigh-Wood. Their marriage was troubled and filled with emotional strain. Vivienne suffered from health problems, and Eliot himself battled anxiety and exhaustion. Their difficult relationship would deeply influence his writing. In 1915, Eliot published “The Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock.” It was unlike traditional poetry. Instead of heroic themes or romantic beauty, it showed a nervous, uncertain man wandering through a modern city, questioning himself and his life. “Do I dare?” Prufrock repeatedly asks. The poem captured the insecurity of modern individuals—people living in crowded cities yet feeling painfully alone. At first, many readers were confused by Eliot’s style. His poems were fragmented, filled with sudden shifts, cultural references, and broken images. But this was intentional. Eliot believed that modern life itself was fragmented. The old sense of unity and faith had been shattered by industrialization, war, and doubt. Poetry, he felt, should reflect that reality honestly. In 1922, Eliot published his masterpiece: The Waste Land. The poem was written during one of the darkest periods of his life. He was mentally and physically exhausted. His marriage was falling apart. Europe was still recovering from the horrors of World War I. The poem became a portrait of a world spiritually empty and emotionally dry—like a wasteland. The Waste Land is filled with voices, languages, myths, and sudden changes. It moves from ancient legends to modern London streets. It speaks of lost love, broken faith, and the search for meaning. Many readers found it difficult, but they also recognized its power. It perfectly captured the mood of the 20th century—a century marked by conflict and uncertainty. Eliot did not believe that poetry should simply express personal emotion. Instead, he argued that poets should connect the present with the past. He called this idea the “historical sense.” In his essays, especially “Tradition and the Individual Talent,” he explained that a poet must understand and respect literary tradition while also creating something new. This balance made Eliot not only a great poet but also a powerful literary critic. In 1927, Eliot made two life-changing decisions. He became a British citizen, and he converted to Anglican Christianity. His faith became central to his later works. Unlike the despair of The Waste Land, his later poetry showed a deeper spiritual search. In poems like “Ash Wednesday” and later Four Quartets, Eliot explored themes of time, redemption, and divine grace. Four Quartets, written during World War II, is considered by many to be his finest achievement. In these four long poems—“Burnt Norton,” “East Coker,” “The Dry Salvages,” and “Little Gidding”—Eliot meditates on time, memory, suffering, and faith. While the world once again burned in war, Eliot wrote about stillness and spiritual hope. He suggested that even in chaos, there is a deeper order if one learns to listen and reflect. By this time, Eliot was widely respected. In 1948, he was awarded the Nobel Prize in Literature. The award recognized his outstanding contribution to modern poetry and criticism. Yet fame did not change his quiet personality. He remained reserved and serious, often dressed formally, speaking carefully, and living modestly. After years of unhappiness, Vivienne was placed in a mental institution in 1938, where she later died. Eliot rarely spoke publicly about their marriage, but its emotional impact stayed with him. In 1957, at the age of 68, he married Valerie Fletcher, who was much younger than he was. This second marriage brought him peace and happiness in his later years. Throughout his life, Eliot believed that poetry was not merely decoration or entertainment. For him, it was a serious art—one that required discipline, intelligence, and emotional honesty. He once wrote that genuine poetry can communicate before it is understood. That is, even when readers do not fully grasp every reference or symbol, they can still feel its truth. T.S. Eliot died on January 4, 1965, in London. His ashes were buried in East Coker, the English village from which his ancestors had emigrated to America centuries earlier. On his memorial plaque are words from Four Quartets: “In my beginning is my end.” It is a line that reflects his lifelong meditation on time and eternity. Eliot’s legacy remains powerful. He helped shape modern poetry, pushing it away from simple romantic expression toward intellectual depth and emotional complexity. His work challenged readers to think, to question, and to confront the spiritual emptiness of modern life. Yet he also offered hope—that through reflection, faith, and tradition, meaning can be rediscovered. In many ways, T.S. Eliot was a poet of paradox. He was an American who became deeply British. He wrote about despair yet searched for faith. He described fragmentation but longed for unity. His poetry may seem difficult, but beneath its complexity lies a sincere attempt to understand the human condition in a changing world. Today, students across the world still read The Waste Land and Four Quartets. Scholars debate his ideas. Writers study his techniques. But beyond the academic discussions, Eliot’s true achievement lies in this: he gave voice to the anxieties of modern humanity while pointing quietly toward spiritual renewal. From the quiet boy in St. Louis to the Nobel Prize–winning poet in London, T.S. Eliot’s life was a journey through doubt, suffering, intellect, and faith. His words continue to echo through time—reminding us that even in a wasteland, there is the possibility of rain.
By The best writer about 10 hours ago in History
Benjamin Franklin: The Mind That Helped Build a Nation
Benjamin Franklin was not born into greatness; he built it piece by piece with curiosity, discipline, and an unshakable belief in the power of learning. Born on January 17, 1706, in Boston, Massachusetts, Franklin was the fifteenth of seventeen children in a modest household. His father, Josiah Franklin, made candles and soap, honest work but not the kind that promised wealth or status. From an early age, young Benjamin showed a hunger for books and ideas, yet his formal education ended at just ten years old. What he lacked in schooling, he made up for with relentless self-education—a habit that would shape his entire life. Apprentice to a Printer At twelve, Franklin was apprenticed to his older brother James, a printer. The print shop became Benjamin’s classroom. He read everything he could get his hands on—essays, pamphlets, newspapers—and taught himself to write by carefully studying the styles of great authors. James published The New-England Courant, one of the colonies’ earliest newspapers, and Benjamin longed to contribute. Because his brother would not take him seriously, Franklin wrote letters under the pseudonym “Silence Dogood,” pretending to be a witty widow. The letters were published and widely admired. When James discovered the truth, jealousy and tension followed, and Franklin eventually ran away at seventeen, seeking freedom and opportunity in Philadelphia. Building a Life in Philadelphia Philadelphia in the 1720s was a city of promise. Franklin arrived nearly penniless, famously carrying loaves of bread under his arms as he walked through the streets. Yet he possessed something more valuable than money: determination. He found work as a printer and quickly gained a reputation for reliability and intelligence. Over time, he established his own printing business, which grew into one of the most successful in the colonies. Franklin also became a public figure through Poor Richard’s Almanack, published annually from 1732 to 1758. Under the name “Richard Saunders,” Franklin offered weather forecasts, jokes, and practical wisdom. Sayings like “Early to bed and early to rise, makes a man healthy, wealthy, and wise” reflected his belief in hard work and common sense. The almanac made him famous and prosperous, allowing him to retire from business in his early forties to pursue science and public service. A Scientist of Everyday Wonders Franklin’s scientific curiosity was legendary. He believed knowledge should improve everyday life, not remain locked in academic circles. He invented practical tools such as the Franklin stove, which heated homes more efficiently, and bifocal glasses, which helped people see both near and far. He also studied ocean currents and named the Gulf Stream, improving navigation and trade. His most famous scientific experiment involved electricity. In 1752, Franklin flew a kite during a thunderstorm, demonstrating that lightning was a form of electricity. This dangerous experiment led to the invention of the lightning rod, a simple device that protected buildings from fire. Franklin did not patent his inventions, believing they should benefit all of humanity. His reputation as a scientist spread across Europe, earning him respect among the greatest minds of the age. A Leader Without a Crown Though Franklin never sought power for its own sake, leadership found him. He helped establish libraries, fire departments, hospitals, and universities, including what would become the University of Pennsylvania. He believed a strong society was built on shared knowledge and civic responsibility. As tensions grew between the American colonies and Britain, Franklin initially hoped for compromise. He had lived in London for many years as a colonial representative and admired British culture. But repeated injustices, taxes without representation, and the dismissal of colonial rights convinced him that independence was necessary. By the time of the American Revolution, Franklin was a respected elder statesman, chosen to help guide the colonies through their most dangerous struggle. Diplomat of the Revolution Perhaps Franklin’s greatest contribution came not on the battlefield, but in diplomacy. Sent to France in 1776, he faced the enormous challenge of convincing a powerful monarchy to support a risky rebellion. Franklin’s charm, wit, and reputation worked wonders. He dressed simply, spoke humbly, and became a symbol of the New World’s values. French philosophers admired him; common people celebrated him. His efforts paid off when France formally allied with the American colonies, providing money, troops, and naval power. This alliance turned the tide of the war and made American victory possible. Without Franklin’s diplomacy, the Revolution might have failed. Shaping a New Nation After the war, Franklin returned home as a hero. Though elderly and in poor health, he continued to serve. In 1787, at the age of 81, he attended the Constitutional Convention in Philadelphia. While he did not speak often, his words carried great weight. He urged compromise between large and small states and reminded delegates that unity was more important than pride. His calm wisdom helped shape the United States Constitution. Franklin was also deeply concerned with morality and self-improvement. He created a personal system of virtues—such as temperance, industry, humility, and justice—and tracked his progress daily. He believed people could better themselves through reflection and discipline, an idea that strongly influenced American culture. Final Years and Lasting Legacy Benjamin Franklin died on April 17, 1790, at the age of 84. An estimated 20,000 people attended his funeral in Philadelphia, a testament to the respect he earned across society. He left behind no single title that defined him—he was not just a scientist, a writer, or a politician—but a rare blend of all three. Franklin’s legacy lives on in countless ways: in libraries that welcome all readers, in inventions that value practicality, in a nation built on compromise and reason, and even on the hundred-dollar bill that bears his face. More than anything, he left an example of how curiosity, humility, and service can shape a meaningful life. Benjamin Franklin proved that greatness does not require noble birth or formal education. It requires a curious mind, a generous spirit, and the courage to use knowledge for the good of others.
By The best writer 6 days ago in History
Comments
There are no comments for this story
Be the first to respond and start the conversation.