Futurism logo

The Fall of a Monopoly: Why I’m Moving Away from ChatGPT After Two Years 📉👑

Why my "sentimental favorite" is losing the battle for my desktop.

By Piotr NowakPublished about 13 hours ago 3 min read

For the past two years, the terms "AI" and "ChatGPT" were practically synonymous. OpenAI didn’t just enter the market; they defined it. They set the gold standard that every other tech giant desperately tried to reach. 🚀

Like many of you, I have been a loyalist. I never hid the fact that ChatGPT was my favorite tool—my primary digital co-pilot. There was a sentimental attachment to the platform that kickstarted this revolution. 🤖 But lately, that sentiment is fading, replaced by a cold, hard realization: the king might be losing its crown. Recently, I’ve noticed a tectonic shift in my own habits. Instead of reflexively opening the GPT tab, my fingers almost automatically type claude.ai. ⌨️ I am not alone in this—many professionals are experiencing the same "migration." Anthropic’s Claude 3.5 Sonnet hasn't just caught up; it has begun to outpace the leader in several critical areas. ⚡

1. The Death of "AI-Speak" ✍️

For a long time, I believed ChatGPT was the gold standard for human-like writing. However, the more we use it, the more we recognize its "scent." We all know the clichés: "In today’s fast-paced world," "It is crucial to note," and those repetitive sentence structures. 🥱

Claude 3.5 Sonnet writes differently. Its style is nuanced, sophisticated, and remarkably less schematic. When I ask Claude for a draft, I don’t receive an "AI-like product" that needs heavy scrubbing. Instead, I get a foundation that sounds like it was written by a high-level copywriter. 📝 It understands subtext and tone in a way that saves me immense amounts of time during the editing phase. It feels less like a machine following a template and more like a collaborator who understands the "vibe." 🤝

2. Technical Precision and the "Artifacts" Revolution 🛠️

The gap becomes even wider when we move into technical territory. If you haven't used Claude’s Artifacts feature yet, you are missing out on a genuine productivity breakthrough. 💡 Being able to view code, live websites, or data visualizations in a dedicated side window—updating in real-time—makes the iterative process seamless. 📊

We’ve all been there with ChatGPT: you provide a prompt, it makes a mistake, you point it out, and it falls into a "loop of apologies" 🔄 without actually fixing the logic. Claude demonstrates a much deeper grasp of complex reasoning. It requires fewer corrections because it seems to "think" through the implications of the code before outputting it. ✅

3. Fighting "Model Laziness" 😴

One of the most frequent complaints among power users of GPT-4o is the perceived "laziness." It often provides truncated code snippets, tells you to "fill in the rest," or gives summaries that are far too brief to be useful.

Claude appears to have more "respect" for the user’s prompt. Its massive context window allows it to digest entire libraries of documents without losing the thread halfway through. 📚 Combined with Anthropic’s "Constitutional AI" framework, the model feels more grounded, less prone to hallucinations, and significantly more predictable for business-critical tasks. When I feed it a 50-page report, I trust Claude to remember the footnote on page 4. 🧐

4. The Free Tier Trade-off ⚖️

To be fair, it’s not a total victory for Claude yet. The biggest hurdle for most users is accessibility. Claude’s free tier is notoriously restrictive, with message limits that can be hit quite quickly during a deep work session. 🛑 OpenAI, on the other hand, remains much more generous with its free access, which keeps them relevant for the casual or budget-conscious user. 💰

5. Looking Ahead: The Consumer Wins 🏆

Does this mean ChatGPT is finished? Absolutnie nie. (Absolutely not.) OpenAI still boasts a massive ecosystem, superior integrations with Microsoft, and voice features that remain the best in the business. 🎤

However, the monopoly is officially over. We are living in an era of choice. We can now pivot between ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and others based on the specific task at hand. This competition is the best possible news for us as consumers. 🌟 As these giants battle for market share, we can expect two things: a rapid acceleration of feature development and, eventually, a drop in subscription prices. 💸

The sentiment is gone. The loyalty has shifted. It’s no longer about who was first; it’s about who works best today. And right now, for me, that’s Claude. 🎯

What about you? Have you felt the "GPT fatigue" lately, or are you staying loyal to OpenAI? Let’s discuss in the comments! 👇

artificial intelligence

About the Creator

Piotr Nowak

Pole in Italy ✈️ | AI | Crypto | Online Earning | Book writer | Every read supports my work on Vocal

Reader insights

Be the first to share your insights about this piece.

How does it work?

Add your insights

Comments (1)

Sign in to comment
  • Cadmaabout 6 hours ago

    I love your breakdown. This is very well written and I think it could help others understand AI.

Find us on social media

Miscellaneous links

  • Explore
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Support

© 2026 Creatd, Inc. All Rights Reserved.