Can ChatGPT replace Programmers?
Limitations of ChatGPT

In a nutshell, ChatGPT is a big language model that is built on GPT3 and GPT 3.5. With that out of the way, let's talk about how it works. An artificial intelligence programme responds to user queries by speaking in English that is very human sounding after applying machine learning techniques to a vast corpus of material.
According to OpenAI, ChatGPT's capabilities are improved via a process called reinforcement learning, which is dependent on input from users. The company will employ people to serve as human AI trainers to engage with the model, playing both the user and the chatbot roles in the process. The quality of the human-like conversational approaches that are reinforced by trainers is determined by comparing the replies supplied by ChatGPT to human responses and rating their similarity.
Scientists that study artificial intelligence (AI) have been awestruck by the capabilities of AlphaCode, which is an artificial intelligence system that can often compete with humans in solving straightforward issues pertaining to computer science. DeepMind, an artificial intelligence located in London and a sister company to Google that introduced the tool in February and has now published its findings in Science, indicating that AlphaCode outperformed almost half of the people competing in coding contests.
Users of social networking platforms have been hypnotised by the capacity of another chatbot, which goes by the name ChatGPT, to generate on demand mini-essays that may seem significant at times but can sometimes sound sublimely stupid. These can include little computer programmes. Yet, these cutting-edge AIs are only capable of carrying out a small number of activities, and experts claim they are not even close to being able to take the job of human computer programmers.
Both ChatGPT and AlphaCode are examples of what are referred to as "big language models." They are neural network-based systems that learn to carry out a job by analysing enormous volumes of previously created text by humans. According to Zico Kolter, a computer scientist at Carnegie Mellon University in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, the two systems make use of "essentially the same architecture." "And although there are of course slight changes in training and execution, the primary distinction, if there is any difference at all, is that they are simply trained on different data sets and, as a result, for various tasks."
AlphaCode is a more specialised tool than ChatGPT, which means that it was trained only on how people responded to questions from software writing contests. ChatGPT is a discussion tool that may be used for a variety of purposes. In an email to Nature, David Choi, a research engineer at DeepMind and co-author of the article, said that "AlphaCode was developed and taught exclusively for competitive programming, not software engineering."
The ChatGPT language model is a large-scale system that is continually trained to enhance its answer accuracy. Nevertheless, since this is an entirely new technological advancement, the model has not yet been through an adequate amount of training. As a result, the AI chatbot might potentially deliver incorrect replies. Because of this, StackOverflow decided to ban ChatGPT, explaining their decision as follows: "Overall, because the average rate of getting correct answers from ChatGPT is too low, posting answers generated by ChatGPT is substantially harmful to both our site and to users who ask for or search for correct answers."
As is the case with many other AI models, ChatGPT's training data has several drawbacks. Both restrictions placed on the training data and inherent biases in the data itself have the potential to adversely affect the output of the model. In point of fact, ChatGPT has shown a prejudice when it comes to the training of data groups representing minorities. For this reason, it is essential to increase the openness of model data in order to lessen the impact of bias caused by this technology.
On Twitter, there is a debate going on over the number of graphics processing units (GPUs) that are required for ChatGPT to function properly. The simple conclusion is that maintaining ChatGPT's operation costs a lot of money. Due to the fact that ChatGPT is a free product, there are now a great deal of concerns over the viability of the technology throughout the course of time.


Comments
There are no comments for this story
Be the first to respond and start the conversation.