Save the Kids part 2

Fraser always handled my deals, but it seems Jordan Galen was the one securing and negotiating them. A prime example is when a negotiation involving K promoting the “Ape Haven” token fell through, revealing potential earnings over half a million dollars—$150,000 allocated for a promotional giveaway. Jordan’s commission would have been between $40,000 to $80,000, with K’s share at $350,000. All for a few promotional tweets. We acquired footage of this negotiation, where Jordan did most of the talking, with Fraser preparing promotional tweets. The negotiation ended on a high note, aiming to boost the project significantly.

Though the deal didn’t materialize, it’s evident how Jordan sourced such opportunities, not just for FaZe Clan members but others like RiceGum too. This raises a crucial question: did FaZe Clan know? FaZe Banks denied any knowledge and subsequently fired Jordan. Jordan claimed he didn’t process these deals through FaZe’s usual channels, hence no contracts or financial gain for FaZe.

Based on the information, it seems FaZe Clan was unaware of these crypto deals. If they had known, it’s unlikely they’d risk their brand for a minor payout. It appears more plausible that Jordan sought side earnings. Despite criticisms, FaZe Clan’s involvement remains unconfirmed.

Three individuals are central to this: Fraser K, who legally challenged me post my video, Sam Pepper, a known crypto promoter, and Jordan Galen, the rogue manager. They ran a crypto pump-and-dump scheme, as seen in blockchain transactions linking their numerous wallets. K and Sam used multiple wallets to conceal their actions, indicating a sophisticated operation.

Sam Pepper, influential in the crypto space, was integral in changing codes to manipulate token transactions, as confirmed by developer Lucas. K might have initiated the “Save the Kids” token but Sam’s code alteration doomed the project. Post-launch, token dumps by involved parties caused the project’s collapse.

An anonymous email implicated Sam Pepper further, showing his heavy involvement. Despite his claims of following K’s lead, evidence suggests otherwise. While awaiting further details from a key player, another anonymous email exposed Sam’s connections, raising more suspicions.

In summary, the intricate web of transactions and interactions between these parties paints a clear picture: this was a deliberate, calculated scheme. Their actions went beyond casual crypto endorsements, reflecting an organized attempt to exploit the system.