A 3-year-old child in Lanzhou was blocked from seeking medical treatment due to gas poisoning, and died due to delayed treatment!

The virus did not cause death, but the indifference of human hearts caused one life after another to leave us, which eventually became one of the "prices".

On November 1, a sad incident occurred in Xiyuan Street, Qilihe District, Lanzhou, Gansu.

A 3-year-old boy was stopped by epidemic prevention personnel on his way to the hospital due to carbon monoxide poisoning. When the child's life was on the line, the staff of our epidemic prevention bayonet neither let the child go out to the hospital, nor were they willing to use their bus to take the child to the hospital for rescue.

The reason is: the epidemic here is very serious.

In the end, under the indignant condemnation of the nearby residents, the epidemic prevention staff showed great mercy and acquiesced in letting go.

But unfortunately, because the child missed the best rescue time, he finally died in the hospital at 15:00 in the afternoon, finishing his life in a hurry.

The child in the remains was pale, as if pinning his infinite grief and nostalgia for this world. And the words "My baby is gone, my heart is broken" made countless netizens cry, and it is a father's direct whipping and accusation of cold-blooded humanity.

After the incident was exposed by netizens and caused public criticism, the local official issued a notice saying that they regretted the death of the child and warmly reminded the majority of residents to regulate the use of gas and electrical facilities.

Is the behavior of the epidemic prevention staff in this incident appropriate? Do you uphold the principle of "life first"? Should one be held accountable for the tragedy? The official notification did not say.

Therefore, this pot must be carried by "carbon monoxide".

What is even more irritating is that after the incident, some staff members in the community even said, "If I am at the checkpoint, I will not let it go. If the child is alive, what will happen outside? The most expensive is dismissal."

Netizens contributed to the dialogue of community members: "If it were me, I would not let go. The child is still alive, what should I do outside? The most is to be fired"

Is this still what people say?

Do you have to be a beast to say such indifferent words?

Epidemic prevention is protection? Or strangle?

Is this a moral downfall? Or the annihilation of humanity?

The dead are gone, and the living wake up.

The question is, are we really awake?

Similar things happened more than once, why is there no contingency plan, resulting in repeated tragedies?

Since the ban is for the lives and health of the common people, why can't the ban be temporarily lifted when a life-threatening incident occurs? Who will be responsible for similar incidents? Is consolation for a life that should not be lost to give someone a warning, a punishment?

The open frontier is encountering moral decline, the indifferent hearts are crying for help, and the pros and cons of weighing are swallowing people's souls.

But fortunately, there are so many impoverished but upright and brave netizens and self-media people who use their humble identities and noble souls to support the conscience and hope of this era.

Children, please go all the way.

May the flowers bloom on the other side, and you are bathing in the sun!