HOW TO OBSERVE AND RECOGNIZE THE TRUTH OF A PROBLEM?

HOW TO OBSERVE AND RECOGNIZE THE TRUTH OF A PROBLEM?

In the realm of systems engineering and problem-solving, understanding how systems develop is crucial for diagnosing and addressing issues effectively. The Theory of Inventive Problem Solving (TRIZ) offers valuable insights into this process through a set of laws that govern system development. These laws, though originally formulated for technical systems, are broadly applicable to various fields, helping us to observe and recognize the truth behind problems.

TRIZ outlines several key laws that guide the evolution of systems. The first is the Law of the Completeness of the Parts of a System, which states that every working system must have four essential components: an engine, transmission, working unit, and control element. A system cannot function effectively if any of these components are missing or underdeveloped.

The Law of Energy Conductivity emphasizes the importance of the smooth flow of energy or information through a system. Disruptions in this flow often signal problems that need to be addressed. The Law of Increasing Ideality highlights that systems tend to evolve towards maximizing benefits while minimizing costs and negative impacts. Meanwhile, the Law of Uneven Development suggests that different parts of a system evolve at different rates, leading to potential contradictions and inefficiencies. Finally, the Law of Transition to a Super-System explains that when a system reaches its developmental limits, it often becomes part of a larger, more complex system, offering new opportunities for growth.

To observe and recognize the truth of a problem, one can apply a systematic method rooted in these TRIZ laws. First, identify the system in question and break it down into its core components. Understanding the role and interaction of each component is essential for diagnosing issues. Next, analyze the energy flow within the system. Any blockage, inefficiency, or misalignment in this flow can be a source of the problem. Evaluating the system's ideality is also crucial; if the costs outweigh the benefits, there is likely an imbalance that needs correction. Finally, look for signs of uneven development, as parts of the system that have not evolved in sync can create significant problems.

Consider a technical example: a manufacturing process experiencing frequent delays. By identifying the system components—machinery, conveyor belts, assembly lines, and quality control—one can see that the transmission, or conveyor system, is malfunctioning. Analyzing the energy flow reveals inefficiencies, and evaluating the system’s ideality shows that the costs of these delays are too high. The problem likely arises from the uneven development between new machinery and an outdated conveyor system, pointing to the need for an upgrade.

For a non-technical example, imagine a retail chain struggling with customer service issues, such as long wait times. By examining the system’s components—customer service representatives, communication channels, service desks, and feedback systems—it becomes clear that the communication channels are inefficient, creating a bottleneck. The ideality of the system is low, as the large number of representatives cannot overcome these communication issues. The root of the problem is uneven development; while the company has expanded its workforce, it has not updated its communication infrastructure, leading to inefficiencies and customer dissatisfaction.

In both examples, applying TRIZ laws and a systematic approach to problem recognition allows for a deeper understanding of the issues at hand and guides the development of effective solutions. This method is not only applicable to technical systems but also to a wide range of situations where system development and efficiency are critical. By observing and recognizing the truth of a problem through this lens, one can identify the underlying causes and implement changes that lead to significant improvements.

#TRIZ #LeanManufacturing #ContinuousImprovement

#FactoryOptimization #Creativethinking