A system thinker, a design thinker, and a linear thinker working together

A system thinker, a design thinker, and a linear thinker working together

Visualization shows several approaches to thinking about and solving complicated issues.

‘They chat about the future house.

A floor plan is created by the linear thinker. He describes the bedrooms, kitchen, bathroom, lounge, and so on. He ensures that each room has appropriate lighting, warmth, and the proper number of plugs, among other things.

Linear thinking divides the universe into smaller segments and focuses on each one individually, according to Houda Boulahbel.

The designer examines the floor plan and makes a list of what future renters will require (He has already interviewed and observed them in their daily life). He observes their way of life and their aim to be as ecologically conscious as possible.

Design thinking begins with the user’s needs, how they act, and what their wants are, and then produces the best answer. Boulahbel, Houda

He then develops a solar-powered home made of energy-efficient materials. He also creates some very smart places to accommodate the family’s lifestyle.

According to the systems thinker, the house of the future will be part of a smart city where outdoor life predominates and people only go home to sleep. He also points out that the designer’s materials do not endure forever; they are expensive and difficult to recycle once they reach the end of their useful life.

They also comprise nanoparticles whose effects on human health have yet to be determined. As a result, they may end up doing more harm than help in the long term. He also illustrates how energy would flow among the city’s many buildings and areas, as well as the optimal locations for energy centers.

Systems thinking gives a broader perspective, focusing on interactions and links between objects, according to Houda Boulahbel.

Which vision would you back?

In my opinion, you would need to balance all three.

If you solely bet on the linear thinker, you may become engrossed in the minutiae of a property and overlook the broader picture.

If you rely solely on the design thinker, you may wind up generating beautiful, elegant solutions to the incorrect problem, or you may end up creating solutions that prolong the problem in the long run.

If you exclusively bet on the systems thinker, you may become immobilized by all the options and considerations and wind up doing nothing at all.

All three must collaborate…

The systems thinker will discover the major issues and leverage points that will assist you in making an effect while limiting unforeseen negative outcomes.

The design thinker may then concentrate on tailoring solutions, while the linear thinker can help focus on execution details.

Linear thinking, design thinking, and systems thinking all compliment one another, according to Houda Boulahbel.

As a culture, we place a high value on linear thinking. We are trained in school and rewarded throughout our careers for our ability to break down a difficulty or a task into smaller, more manageable bits.

While this has served us well (many scientific breakthroughs have resulted from linear thinking), it is becoming increasingly difficult in today’s complicated environment.

Many instances of complicated issues that continue despite efforts to fix them may be found around you: rising rates of chronic illnesses such as cancer and cardiovascular disease, political disputes and wars that last for years or even decades.

There are several instances of treatments that initially succeed but subsequently cause additional problems, such as multi-resistant bacteria caused by antibiotic usage or well-meaning assistance packages that lead to increasing poverty in the nations that receive them.

If you are attempting to solve such complicated challenges, inviting your three thinkers rather than the linear thinker alone will increase your chances of success.