The lost city of Giants in Ethiopia
What archeologists found
The Lost City of Giants in Ethiopia is a fascinating archaeological enigma that has captured the imagination of explorers and researchers for centuries. Situated in the heart of the African continent, Ethiopia has a rich historical and cultural heritage, but it is the tales of a hidden city populated by giants that have fueled legends and inspired countless quests.
The origins of the myth surrounding the Lost City of Giants can be traced back to ancient Ethiopian folklore and oral traditions. According to local legends, there once existed a magnificent city inhabited by a race of giants who possessed extraordinary strength and knowledge. These giants were said to be the children of fallen angels and human women, a concept reminiscent of the biblical Nephilim. The city was believed to be a hub of advanced civilization, with architectural wonders and technological marvels far beyond the capabilities of ordinary humans.
The accounts of the Lost City of Giants were largely considered mythical until the 1930s when an explorer named G.E. Steuart McBride embarked on an expedition to investigate the legends. McBride, an experienced adventurer, was intrigued by the stories and set out to find evidence of the city's existence. His journey led him deep into the rugged landscapes of Ethiopia, where he discovered ancient ruins and massive stone structures that seemed to support the legends.
The recent discovery of an ancient city in Harlaa, Ethiopia, has generated excitement and speculation about the existence of giants. Led by Timothy Insoll from the University of Exeter, the archaeological team focused on uncovering evidence of ancient settlements that could shed light on the legends of giants in the region.
According to local accounts, stories and legends of giants have been passed down through generations. Some of the structures found in the area are built with massive stones that would require extraordinary strength to lift. These accounts, along with the discovery of old coins and pottery, suggest the presence of an ancient settlement in the region.
However, it is important to note that while such evidence hints at the possibility of giants, no direct proof has been found thus far. The focus of the research in Harlaa has primarily been on exploring the ancient city and its connections to the wider world. Surprisingly, the excavations have revealed a previously unknown aspect of Ethiopia's history—a strong connection to international trade.
Archaeologists have uncovered Islamic burials, headstones, a 12th-century mosque, and a variety of artifacts from regions such as Madagascar, the Maldives, Yemen, China, and Egypt. This suggests that Harlaa was a thriving trading center between the 10th and 15th centuries. Insoll has described the city as a cosmopolitan hub for jewelry making and trade, where residents from different cultures and backgrounds interacted with traders from the Red Sea, Indian Ocean, and possibly even the Arabian Gulf.
While the recent discoveries in Harlaa shed light on Ethiopia's historical importance as a trading center, they do not provide conclusive evidence regarding the existence of giants. The legends and accounts passed down by locals serve as intriguing folklore, but further investigation is required to ascertain the truth behind these stories.
It is worth noting that tales of giants exist in various cultures around the world. Ancient myths and legends often depict giant beings with extraordinary abilities and strengths. While there is no concrete scientific evidence to support the existence of giants, the prevalence of such stories across different civilizations suggests that they may have had a basis in ancient encounters or misinterpretations of natural phenomena.
The ongoing research in Harlaa aims to delve deeper into the history and origins of the city's inhabitants. The analysis of human remains from the cemetery and further exploration of the archaeological site may provide valuable insights into the lives and cultures of the people who once lived there.
In conclusion, while the recent excavation in Harlaa, Ethiopia has unveiled a fascinating ancient city and highlighted the region's importance in international trade, there is no definitive proof of the existence of giants. The legends and folklore surrounding giants continue to capture our imaginations, but scientific investigation and rigorous archaeological research are necessary to separate fact from fiction and unravel the mysteries of the past.
About the Creator
Keep reading
More stories from Eddie Young and writers in Earth and other communities.
Why the secret doors of the Taj Mahal and Sphinx of Giza are never opened
There are numerous establishments worldwide that have remained closed for decades or even centuries, harboring secrets and treasures within their sealed doors. Here, we explore four fascinating locations that have yet to reveal their mysteries.
By Eddie Young3 years ago in Education
Nitrogen is necessary for young tropical rain forests to combat climate change.
By absorbing carbon dioxide from the atmosphere and storing it in wood, tropical rainforests contribute to the slowing of climate change. Forests that develop quickly are even more important because they absorb carbon more quickly.
By Francis Dami3 days ago in Earth
DoJ Attorneys Resign Over Decision Not to Investigate Agent in Minneapolis ICE Shooting
A Justice Department Decision Sparks Fallout Several US Department of Justice (DoJ) attorneys have resigned following an internal decision not to pursue a criminal investigation into a federal immigration agent involved in a shooting in Minneapolis, according to multiple officials familiar with the matter. The resignations have intensified scrutiny of the DoJ’s handling of the case and fueled public debate over law enforcement accountability, particularly when federal agents are involved. The shooting, which occurred during an Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) operation in Minneapolis, has already drawn local outrage and national attention. The decision not to open a formal investigation has now added a new layer of controversy—this time from within the Justice Department itself. What Is Known About the Minneapolis ICE Shooting Details surrounding the incident remain limited, as authorities have not released a full public account. What has been confirmed is that an ICE agent discharged a firearm during an operation, resulting in a civilian being shot. The condition of the victim has not been fully detailed in official statements, though local officials confirmed the individual survived. Local law enforcement initially responded to the scene, but jurisdictional authority shifted quickly due to the involvement of a federal agent. Under standard procedure, incidents involving federal officers are typically reviewed by the DoJ to determine whether a civil rights or criminal investigation is warranted. It was this review—and its outcome—that ultimately triggered internal dissent. Why DoJ Attorneys Walked Away According to sources familiar with the resignations, multiple attorneys—some with experience in civil rights and public integrity cases—objected strongly to the decision not to open a formal investigation. They argued that the shooting met the threshold for independent review, regardless of whether charges were ultimately brought. One former official described the decision as “a dangerous precedent,” warning that declining to investigate could erode public trust. Others reportedly felt that political considerations, rather than legal standards, influenced the outcome. While the DoJ has not publicly confirmed the number of resignations, officials acknowledged that departures occurred and said they were handled in accordance with internal procedures. The Justice Department’s Position In a brief statement, the Department of Justice said it had conducted an initial assessment of the incident and concluded that there was insufficient basis to proceed with a criminal investigation at this time. Officials emphasized that such decisions are made after reviewing available evidence, including use-of-force policies and witness statements. The department rejected claims that the decision was politically motivated, insisting that prosecutors follow established legal thresholds rather than public pressure. However, the DoJ declined to provide further details, citing the sensitive nature of law enforcement operations and personnel matters. Minneapolis Officials and Community Reaction In Minneapolis, the reaction has been swift and critical. City leaders and community advocates have called for greater transparency, arguing that federal agents operating within city limits should be subject to the same level of scrutiny as local police. “This isn’t about politics—it’s about accountability,” said a local civil rights advocate. “When someone is shot, there must be an independent investigation, regardless of the badge involved.” Protests and community meetings have followed, with residents demanding the release of body camera footage, operational details, and a clearer explanation for the DoJ’s decision. ICE Operations Under Renewed Scrutiny The shooting and subsequent fallout have reignited broader concerns about ICE enforcement tactics. Critics argue that immigration operations often take place with limited oversight, creating conditions where accountability gaps can emerge. Advocacy groups note that ICE agents are armed and authorized to use force, yet incidents involving shootings are relatively rare—and therefore require especially careful review when they occur. Supporters of ICE counter that agents operate in dangerous environments and must make split-second decisions, warning against rushing to judgment without full facts. Political Pressure and the Rule of Law The resignations have also raised questions about political pressure within federal law enforcement agencies. While no direct evidence has been made public, former prosecutors say internal disagreement of this magnitude is unusual and concerning. “When career attorneys resign over a single decision, it signals a serious breakdown of trust,” said a former federal prosecutor. “That doesn’t happen lightly.” Lawmakers from both parties have begun asking questions, with some calling for congressional oversight hearings into the incident and the DoJ’s decision-making process. Legal Standards vs Public Expectations At the heart of the controversy is a long-standing tension in US justice: the gap between legal thresholds for prosecution and public expectations of accountability. Opening an investigation does not imply guilt, but declining to investigate can be perceived as preemptively closing the door on transparency. Civil rights experts argue that even if prosecutors believe charges are unlikely, a formal investigation can still serve an important public interest. “The process matters as much as the outcome,” said one legal scholar. “Especially when federal authority is involved.” What Happens Next While the DoJ has indicated it will not revisit its decision at this time, pressure is mounting. Civil lawsuits, independent reviews, or congressional inquiries could still follow. Meanwhile, the resignations themselves may become part of a broader reckoning inside the Justice Department, as leaders assess how internal dissent is handled—and how public confidence can be restored. For the attorneys who resigned, the decision appears to have been a matter of principle. For the public, the unanswered questions surrounding the Minneapolis shooting remain unresolved. Conclusion: A Case That Won’t Fade Quietly The resignations of DoJ attorneys over the decision not to investigate an ICE agent involved in a Minneapolis shooting have turned a single law enforcement incident into a national flashpoint. Beyond the specifics of the case, the episode raises fundamental questions about accountability, transparency, and the independence of the justice system. Whether through further investigation, legal action, or political oversight, the issue is unlikely to disappear—and the consequences may shape how similar cases are handled in the future.
By Aarif Lashari5 days ago in Earth
Comments
There are no comments for this story
Be the first to respond and start the conversation.