Social science as opposed to natural science
Social science as opposed to natural science
It's a long story. We must begin with what is society and what is nature. What is society? The society was the place where the gods were worshipped in ancient times. In the past, people at the bottom generally did not have a special meeting hall, and they usually went to the society to discuss things. This is the society. So society means people coming together. From this we know that one person cannot form a society. Can we call it human society if there is only Adam in the world? Can't. It takes at least two people to form a society. The simplest society is one of two people. Any complex things are composed of the simplest things, so we should study any problem from the simplest research, simple research thoroughly, complex problems can be easily solved, do not aim too high. Newton solved the mystery of complex motion by studying the motion of an iron ball in a chute. He did not begin with complex motion. Now let's look at the simplest society of two people. What is the relationship between these two people, what is the phenomenon? Let's do it theoretically, list all the possible relationships, all the phenomena that can happen. Self sufficiency. Each of them did his work and enjoyed the fruits of his Labour. This is self-sufficiency. The relationship between two people is independent and equal. The following things can happen in this relationship: 1 The two people are always on their own, neither helping the other. This is the relationship of independence, equality and self-care. The two people may also help each other. He couldn't lift a stone, so I helped him. I can't catch rabbits. He taught me how to catch rabbits. This is the relationship of independence, equality and mutual assistance. Stealing and cheating between two people. He came to my apple tree at night to steal one of my apples to eat, or I told his fortune to cheat him a handful of rice. This is the relationship between independence and equality. 4 Robbery between two men leads to open fighting. This is the relationship of independence, equality and hostility. Market economy. Two people may exchange goods with each other, and this creates a market economy. The relationship between two people is an independent and equal exchange of goods. The above four phenomena can also occur in such a relationship. Three exploitation. Two people fight or compete, one loses, the means of production is taken by the other, and they become slaves or hired laborers. This is the exploitative relationship. No more independence and equality. The last three of the above four phenomena will occur in this relationship. Public ownership. Two persons may also combine the means of production into joint ownership. Two people work together and enjoy the fruits of their labor. This is the relationship of equals. There is no independent relationship anymore. The second of the above four phenomena occurs in such a system. Here are the relationships and phenomena that can occur between two people in the simplest society. If there's only one person, can you have these relationships? Can't. Can these phenomena occur? Can't. So a society has to have at least two people. Two people are more complicated than one. And no matter how many people there are in a society, no matter how complex the relations and phenomena are, they are all composed of the relations and phenomena of these two people. Let's talk about social phenomena. Now let's summarize the definition of social phenomena from the social phenomena listed above. Social phenomenon is a phenomenon occurring under the action of subjective consciousness and by the interaction of people. This definition emphasizes two points: first, under the action of subjective consciousness. Social phenomena must occur under the action of subjective consciousness, and those that do not occur under the action of subjective consciousness are not social phenomena. Corruption, theft, exploitation and assistance are all social phenomena due to the action of subjective consciousness. Illness does not occur under the influence of subjective consciousness, so it is not social phenomenon. Caused by human interaction. There have to be at least two for it to happen. If it can happen with just one person, it's not a social phenomenon. Getting sick can happen with only one person, so it's not a social phenomenon. Only when the above two points are met simultaneously can it be called a social phenomenon. Infectious disease, can't happen below the circumstance of a person only, is infectious disease social phenomenon? Because it does not happen under the action of human subjective consciousness, it is not a social phenomenon. However, if a person deliberately infects others, it is a social phenomenon. So we should look at it dialectically and make a concrete analysis of specific problems. Is childbirth a social phenomenon? Usually not. But if someone deliberately wants to have more boys or girls, or wants to have a planned birth, that's a social phenomenon. Is labor a social phenomenon? One person can work, so individual work is not a social phenomenon. But collective Labour is a social phenomenon. Is suicide a social phenomenon? Is starvation a social phenomenon? Think for yourself. After social phenomena, let's talk about natural phenomena. There are broad and narrow definitions of natural phenomena. Natural phenomena in the broad sense include those produced by animals, while natural phenomena in the narrow sense do not include animals. The phenomena produced by subjective consciousness among animals are also social phenomena. Natural phenomenon in narrow sense refers to the phenomenon produced by objects without subjective consciousness. Wind and rain are natural phenomena. Social science is the science that studies the laws of social phenomena, or the laws of society; Natural science is the science that studies the laws of natural phenomena, or the laws of nature.
About the Creator
Keep reading
More stories from writers in Earth and other communities.
Britain in Talks With NATO to Boost Arctic Security
The Arctic Is No Longer a Frozen Backwater For decades, the Arctic sat quietly on the margins of global politics—remote, frozen, and largely ignored. That era is over. Britain is now in talks with NATO to strengthen Arctic security, acknowledging growing risks posed by Russia and China. In a notable shift, London’s assessment aligns closely with warnings long emphasized by Donald Trump, particularly as he continues to express strategic interest in Greenland. What once sounded like an eccentric fixation has evolved into a serious geopolitical conversation. The Arctic is rapidly becoming one of the world’s most contested regions, and Britain is positioning itself to play a larger role. Why Britain Is Paying Attention Now Although the UK is not an Arctic nation, it is an Arctic-adjacent power with significant strategic interests. British officials increasingly view the High North as critical to national and allied security. Melting ice is opening new shipping routes, exposing untapped natural resources, and making military movement easier than ever before. Britain’s talks with NATO focus on intelligence sharing, joint exercises, surveillance capabilities, and protecting undersea infrastructure such as communication cables and energy pipelines. These are not abstract concerns. Any disruption in the Arctic could have immediate consequences for European security and global trade. In short, what happens in the Arctic does not stay in the Arctic. Russia’s Expanding Arctic Footprint Russia is the dominant military power in the Arctic, and it is not slowing down. Moscow has reopened Soviet-era bases, deployed advanced missile systems, expanded its icebreaker fleet, and increased patrols across the region. The Arctic coastline represents a core part of Russia’s nuclear deterrent, making it strategically vital to the Kremlin. From NATO’s perspective, this military buildup creates both risk and uncertainty. Britain, which has long been vocal about Russian aggression—from Ukraine to cyber warfare—sees the Arctic as another front where deterrence must be strengthened before tensions spiral. The concern is not necessarily an immediate conflict, but miscalculation. In a region with harsh conditions and limited communication infrastructure, even minor incidents could escalate rapidly. China’s Quiet but Steady Arctic Ambitions While Russia’s presence is overt, China’s Arctic strategy is more subtle—and equally concerning to Western planners. Beijing calls itself a “near-Arctic state,” a label that has raised eyebrows in Europe and North America. Through investments, research stations, and partnerships, China is laying the groundwork for long-term influence. Britain shares NATO’s concern that China could use civilian projects for dual-use purposes, blending scientific research with intelligence gathering and infrastructure control. As Arctic shipping routes become commercially viable, China’s interest in controlling parts of the supply chain only grows. London’s alignment with these concerns reflects a broader shift in UK foreign policy: China is no longer viewed solely as an economic partner, but as a strategic competitor. Trump, Greenland, and Strategic Reality Donald Trump’s repeated interest in Greenland—most famously his suggestion that the United States should buy it—was widely mocked at the time. Yet behind the headlines was a strategic logic that many Western governments now openly acknowledge. Greenland sits at the heart of the Arctic, hosting vital air and naval routes between North America and Europe. It is also rich in rare earth minerals critical for modern technology and defense systems. As ice recedes, Greenland’s strategic value only increases. Britain’s current position, which aligns with Trump’s warnings about Arctic vulnerabilities, shows how quickly political perceptions can change. What once seemed unconventional now appears prescient. NATO’s Arctic Awakening NATO has traditionally focused on Eastern Europe and the North Atlantic. The Arctic, despite its importance, received less coordinated attention. That is changing. Britain’s talks with NATO reflect a broader alliance effort to integrate Arctic defense into its core strategy. This includes: Increased joint military exercises in cold-weather environments Enhanced monitoring of Russian and Chinese activity Strengthening cooperation with Arctic nations like Norway, Canada, and Denmark Protecting critical undersea and satellite infrastructure For Britain, this is also about credibility. As a leading NATO member and a key military power, the UK wants to demonstrate that it can contribute meaningfully beyond its immediate geography. Climate Change as a Security Multiplier One of the most striking aspects of Arctic security is how closely it is tied to climate change. Melting ice is not just an environmental issue—it is a strategic one. New sea lanes shorten travel between Asia and Europe, while access to oil, gas, and minerals becomes easier. This transformation increases competition and reduces natural barriers that once limited military movement. Britain’s involvement reflects recognition that climate-driven changes are reshaping the security landscape faster than traditional institutions were designed to handle. In this sense, Arctic security is a preview of future global challenges where environmental change and geopolitics collide. Domestic and Diplomatic Balancing Acts Britain’s Arctic engagement is not without challenges. Increased military involvement raises questions about defense spending, priorities, and escalation risks. Diplomatically, London must balance deterrence with dialogue, avoiding actions that could unnecessarily provoke Russia while still protecting allied interests. There is also the question of public awareness. Arctic security lacks the visibility of conflicts like Ukraine, making it harder to sustain political attention. Yet policymakers increasingly argue that prevention is cheaper—and safer—than crisis response. What This Means Going Forward Britain’s talks with NATO mark an important shift in how the Arctic is viewed: not as a distant frontier, but as a central arena in 21st-century security. Agreement with Trump-era assessments on Russia, China, and Greenland underscores how geopolitical realities can outlast political controversies. As competition intensifies, the Arctic will likely become a testing ground for cooperation, deterrence, and strategic foresight. Britain’s involvement signals that mid-sized powers are no longer content to watch from the sidelines. Final Thoughts The Arctic is warming faster than any other region on Earth—and so are the geopolitical tensions surrounding it. Britain’s move to boost Arctic security with NATO reflects a growing consensus that ignoring the High North is no longer an option. Whether driven by Russia’s militarization, China’s quiet expansion, or lessons drawn from Trump’s blunt warnings, one truth stands out: the future of global security may well be shaped at the top of the world, where ice, ambition, and power now intersect.
By Muhammad Hassan2 days ago in Earth
Milo Manheim
Milo Manheim has steadily built a reputation as one of Disney’s most recognizable young stars, thanks to his charm, musical talent, and approachable screen presence. Known widely for his breakout role in Disney Channel’s Zombies franchise, Manheim has now found himself at the center of online discussions surrounding Disney’s ambitious slate of live-action adaptations. Among these, the idea of a Tangled live action film has sparked intense fan curiosity, with Milo Manheim frequently mentioned in speculative casting conversations. While Disney has not officially confirmed every detail, the growing buzz around a Disney Tangled live action project reflects the enduring popularity of the animated classic and the excitement surrounding its potential cast. Milo Manheim’s Rise in Disney Entertainment Milo Manheim entered the spotlight with a natural ease that made him instantly relatable to younger audiences. As the son of actress Camryn Manheim, he inherited a strong foundation in performance, but his success has been distinctly his own. His work blends humor, sincerity, and musical confidence—qualities that align closely with Disney’s storytelling style. Beyond Disney Channel films, Manheim has expanded his range through stage performances and competitive television, proving he is more than a one-note actor. This versatility is one reason his name continues to appear in conversations about major Disney roles, including speculation around Tangled. Why Tangled Remains a Perfect Live-Action Candidate Released in 2010, Tangled reimagined the story of Rapunzel with humor, heart, and stunning animation. Over a decade later, it remains one of Disney’s most beloved modern fairy tales. The blend of adventure, romance, and self-discovery makes it especially suited for a live-action retelling. A live action Tangled film would follow Disney’s recent trend of revisiting animated favorites, offering a more grounded visual style while preserving the emotional core of the original. Fans are particularly interested in how the tangled live action cast would bring iconic characters to life, especially Rapunzel and Flynn Rider. Milo Manheim and the Flynn Rider Conversation One of the most common fan-driven theories places Milo Manheim in the role of Flynn Rider. The character’s mix of roguish confidence and underlying vulnerability aligns well with Manheim’s on-screen persona. Flynn Rider is not a traditional prince—he’s witty, flawed, and ultimately sincere, traits that Manheim has demonstrated across his performances. While Disney has not confirmed casting details, the speculation alone highlights how strongly audiences associate Manheim with roles that require both charisma and emotional depth. If chosen, he would join the broader tangled cast legacy that fans already adore. Rapunzel Live Action Casting Speculation Just as much attention surrounds the potential rapunzel live action cast. Rapunzel is a character defined by curiosity, resilience, and warmth, making her one of Disney’s most relatable heroines. Recently, online discussions have connected actress Teagan Croft to the role, leading to widespread interest in teagan croft tangled fan concepts. Croft, known for her compelling performances, brings a balance of strength and sensitivity that could translate well to a rapunzel live action portrayal. Interest in teagan croft movies and tv shows has grown alongside these casting rumors, as audiences imagine how she might embody the iconic princess. Building the Disney Tangled Live Action Cast A successful disney tangled cast live action would rely on chemistry as much as individual talent. Rapunzel and Flynn Rider’s relationship is central to the story, evolving from mistrust to mutual respect and love. Casting actors who can convincingly portray that journey will be key. Beyond the leads, characters like Mother Gothel and the supporting ensemble would also shape the film’s tone. Disney’s challenge lies in honoring the animated original while allowing actors to bring fresh interpretations. This balance has defined the success—or failure—of past live-action adaptations. The Importance of Staying True to the Story One reason Tangled has endured is its emotional honesty. At its heart, the film is about freedom, identity, and the courage to step into the unknown. A disney tangled live action adaptation must preserve these themes while adapting them for a new visual medium. Fans aren’t simply looking for a scene-by-scene remake; they want a story that feels familiar yet alive. With the right creative team and casting choices, the transition from animation to live action could deepen the emotional impact rather than dilute it. Milo Manheim’s Future Beyond Speculation Whether or not Milo Manheim becomes officially linked to tangled live action, the speculation itself reflects his growing influence in the industry. He represents a generation of actors shaped by Disney but not limited by it. His career choices suggest a desire to explore diverse roles while staying connected to the audience that supported his rise. As Disney continues to develop its live-action portfolio, actors like Manheim remain central to the conversation—not because of confirmed roles, but because audiences can already imagine them stepping into iconic characters. A Story Fans Are Ready to Revisit The excitement surrounding tangled live action cast discussions shows just how deeply the story still resonates. Rapunzel’s journey, Flynn Rider’s transformation, and the vibrant world of Tangled continue to inspire new generations of viewers. If and when Disney officially unveils its plans, the anticipation will only grow. Until then, the combination of Milo Manheim’s rising star power and the enduring magic of Tangled keeps fans engaged, hopeful, and eager to see how this beloved fairy tale might shine in live action.
By Saboor Brohi 6 days ago in Earth
Comments
There are no comments for this story
Be the first to respond and start the conversation.