The Poetry Dimension
... and my relationship therein
I have been telling stories since I first learned to speak. I’ve been writing since I first had the motor control to grip a pencil in my little ravioli fist. One of my two Bachelors degrees is in Creative Writing, for goodness sake! I like to imagine, dear friends and enemies, that I have made somewhat of a life for myself out of the written word. But if this is the case, dear reader, then why does poetry confuse and upset me so damn much?
My first undergraduate creative writing class was, in fact, Intro to Poetry. In it, I learned about the creative versatility of the written and spoken word, and the plethora of muses that exist for the fledgling poet to take on in their pursuit of creative liberation. Somehow one summer, in the sudden absence of a different student, I was tasked with providing feedback to hundreds of high school poets who had submitted for the university’s teen magazine. Hell, I even provided a similar service when I read poetry (and prose) submissions for The Lit Mug, a literary mugazine I once ran with my friends. I am not inexperienced in reading and trying my best to verbalize my experience with poetry, and yet, when it comes time to offer feedback, I can only really ever say, “Wow, these are certainly words, and you definitely wrote them. Super cool.”
Perhaps the sheer expressive potential of poetry daunts me. Perhaps the expansion of poetry from a literary art into a sonic art as well provides something that I simply do not have the mental fortitude to process passively. However, there is so much poetry that exists that I also simply cannot lend attention to every piece of it to be actively moved by it. I then wonder, by that token, should I let myself be moved by it? Is there actually something unattainable to me here?
In our undergrad, my fellow prosewrights and I would speak of something known only to us as the Poetry Dimension, a mythical dimension that only the poets among us had access to. In it, communication was only abstract, symbolic, allegorical, expressive without being concrete in any way, shape, or form. Our poetic peers in the program would reside there, and there they would write the smatterings of words that got them published in literary journals on-campus and off-campus. They would reach critical acclaim from professors and readers, and yet whenever I flipped through their chapbooks on the shelves of the Writer’s Institute, all I would find were words, nothing greatly affecting me one bit.
Of course, maybe this has something to do with my own view of writing. Words to me are purely functional. Sure, they may be florid from time to time, but ultimately, I want to express something concrete. My favorite song lyric of all time, from “Going to Georgia” by The Mountain Goats, is: “The most remarkable thing about you standing in the doorway is that it’s you, and that you’re standing in the doorway.” There is nothing remarkable about that language. It’s blunt, it’s literal, and yet it’s filled with this incredible and tangible pathos that I don’t get from any sort of free-verse poem that has the same message. When I do dabble in free-verse, it’s simply to enter a competition on Vocal, and when I write poetry in general, it’s almost always a sonnet to impress a beautiful woman with my masterful control of language (it does not work). When I read the work of others on Vocal, I can seldom understand what makes a good poem and what makes a mediocre poem. Is it the line breaks? It’s the line breaks, right? If I did that in the middle of a short story, I’d be tarred and feathered. Why do you have to fracture thought like that?
Perhaps I will never traverse the Poetry Dimension. Perhaps I will be a weaker author because of that. Or perhaps poetry is a literary circle-jerk and I’m right for never subsuming myself fully into the manner of expression. (After all, I do find it suspect that the only people who appear to be in tune with the quality of poetry are the people who stand to profit from it.) In whichever case, I assume you poets will keep poeming on parallel to me as I try my best to accomplish whatever I set out in prose to accomplish. Keep it up, I suppose. I literally cannot tell if you’re doing a good job or not.
About the Creator
Steven Christopher McKnight
Disillusioned twenty-something, future ghost of a drowned hobo, cryptid prowling abandoned operahouses, theatre scholar, prosewright, playwright, aiming to never work again.
Venmo me @MickTheKnight


Comments (11)
I really like this. I've written more poetry than ever since I joined Vocal (since the majority of the challenges seem to be poetry), but I confess that I still don't understand it. It's nice to see my feelings written out in words.
I appreciate how you admit confusion rather than forcing reverence. That honesty feels more literary than performative.
A lot of people are turned off by poetry, and for the most part, they haven't read that much, so they assume they don't like it. As with classic literature, when you're forced to read things in school, you're often resistant due to the forcing, or what they're forcing on you just isn't relatable or enjoyable. Case in point, the only poem I remember from my pre-college years is "The Village Smithy" because we were forced to memorize it, like the Gettysburg Address. It was fine. In college I took intro to Poetry, and we read the Shakespeare sonnets, and Rime of the Ancient Mariner and the other usual suspects. That was at least somewhat interesting, but by that point I had discovered a key book, "The Portable Beat Reader", which introduced me to guys like Kerouac and Ginsberg, and the lyrics of Bob Dylan. People who broke the mold and started something new and interesting. What really got me excited about poetry was Charles Bukowski, and later Leonard Cohen. They started the fire in me, because they knew all that stuff from school was for the most part, dry, uninspiring, flowery shit. To be fair, some people like that. But that's exactly the stuff that makes most people think they hate poetry. As for what you read here, or student poetry, you're right. It's not moving, because for the most part, it's not very good. Some poets rhyme, others don't. Some on here are very, very prolific, and their stuff rhymes all the time. My issue with rhyming poetry is, make sure it rhymes, and get your meter down, because if it doesn't, the poem you wrote that's supposed to flow and depict a certain feeling will suddenly go off the rails like a train wreck and make the reader wince.
This was such an honest and entertaining reflection. I love the idea of the “Poetry Dimension” as both a mystery and a frustration, your self-awareness and humor make the uncertainty feel relatable rather than dismissive. A really engaging read.
Now the question is, do you feel moved by visual art? I suspect that if the answer is no, there might just be something wrong with you. ;D In all seriousness, though, I get it. A lot of "poetry" is just prose identifying as the form. I often wonder how much of the outer poetry space is consumed by "support without question" rather than honest engagement, which leaves those looking on, like you, to feel that it's an undefined space. Even those within the Poetry Publishing Clubhouse can fall into that trap, which is always disappointing to see. Granted, it is subjective to be moved by poetry, which is why I think that it shouldn't be judged based on personal movement, but the objective observation that movement is to be had by some readers, or most. (And, if I'm being honest, if a poem lacks figurative language or clever wordplay, I struggle to define it as poetry.) Challenges/contests can vary widely in their judgement. I'm often baffled by what wins and doesn't, even when my own work is included in the former. I really enjoyed reading this piece, Stephen! You're hilarious, as always, and the points you raise are worth thinking about. Glad it got TS, too!
It's the line breaks. In an existential, tormented way, there is a beauty to the broken things. I write poorly sometimes trying to bandage it all together. Very nice piece and congratulations.
Powerfully written and woven together.
I poem some when I’m not just prosing along at my own pace. Btw, really impressed by your work and would be honored if you’d read some of mine.
Hilarious and fun to read!
Loved this! Your take on the Poetry Dimension really resonated...honest, funny, and oddly comforting for those of us who wander in prose.
I thought your commenting style was quite poetic, so this was a fascinating read. 😄I like that you still make room and time for reading and writing poetry despite your purported dislike/lack of understanding. 👏