It is wrong to choose IPL before the country- this former Australian legend got angry with Hazelwood’s decision

Josh Hazlewood was part of Australia’s playing XI in the highly anticipated World Test Championship (WTC) 2025 final against South Africa. Despite being an important figure in Australia’s bowling lineup, Hazlewood has recently faced criticism from former Australian fast bowler Mitchell Johnson, who questioned Hazlewood’s priorities and commitment to the national team. Johnson’s critique came after Hazlewood chose to participate in the Indian Premier League (IPL) 2025, which was postponed and later resumed amid tensions between India and Pakistan, instead of focusing fully on preparations for the WTC final.

Hazlewood’s decision to return to the IPL midway through the season raised eyebrows in the cricketing community. The IPL 2025 was temporarily halted due to political tensions between India and Pakistan, and many players left India to return home during this period. However, Hazlewood was among the players who opted to come back and complete the tournament. Playing for Royal Challengers Bangalore (RCB), he was instrumental in the team’s successful campaign, which culminated in RCB winning their first-ever IPL title after defeating Punjab Kings in the final. Over the season, Hazlewood claimed 22 wickets, showcasing his skill and consistency in the shortest format of the game. In the IPL final, he dismissed Punjab opener Priyansh Arya, a crucial wicket that helped tilt the match in RCB’s favor.

However, the scenario was quite different when Hazlewood represented Australia in the WTC final at Lord’s Cricket Ground. Despite being given an opportunity ahead of fellow pacer Scott Boland by captain Pat Cummins, Hazlewood managed to take only two wickets throughout the match. His performance was considered below expectations, especially given the high stakes of the contest. Ultimately, South Africa emerged victorious by five wickets, securing the WTC title and ending a 27-year wait for a major ICC trophy.

Mitchell Johnson, a former pace spearhead for Australia known for his aggressive bowling and IPL experience, expressed his disappointment in Hazlewood’s choices through a column published in ‘The West Australian.’ Johnson highlighted concerns about Hazlewood’s fitness, which had been an ongoing issue in recent years. He found it surprising that Hazlewood prioritized returning to a postponed IPL over focusing on national duties and preparing for one of the most significant events in world cricket. Johnson’s own IPL background, having played for Kolkata Knight Riders, Kings XI Punjab, and Mumbai Indians over six seasons, lent weight to his observations. He questioned whether Hazlewood’s decision truly reflected commitment to representing Australia at the highest level, suggesting that such choices might undermine team cohesion and focus.

Beyond just Hazlewood’s individual decisions, Johnson also weighed in on the future of Australia’s renowned ‘Big Four’ bowling attack, consisting of Mitchell Starc, Josh Hazlewood, Pat Cummins, and Nathan Lyon. This quartet has been the backbone of Australia’s Test bowling for many years, delivering consistent performances across formats. However, Johnson cautioned that relying heavily on these experienced players while neglecting the introduction and nurturing of fresh talent was not sustainable. He suggested that if these veterans are only motivated by marquee tournaments like the Ashes, it reflects a problematic mindset. Johnson emphasized the importance of trusting future Test stars and providing opportunities to younger players who can eventually succeed the current crop. This, he argued, would ensure the longevity and competitiveness of Australian cricket in the years ahead.

The situation surrounding Hazlewood’s IPL participation and WTC final performance sparked broader discussions about player priorities, workload management, and national versus franchise commitments. Many fans and experts sympathize with the pressures players face juggling international duties with lucrative T20 leagues like the IPL. At the same time, representing the country in prestigious events such as the World Test Championship remains the pinnacle of cricketing honor and responsibility.

In conclusion, Josh Hazlewood’s season was a tale of contrasting fortunes—dominating in the IPL but struggling to make an impact in the WTC final. Mitchell Johnson’s pointed criticism serves as a reminder of the complex balancing act modern cricketers must manage between club and country. As Australia looks to rebuild and plan for the future, the emphasis on fitness, commitment, and developing new talent will be crucial. Hazlewood’s experience underscores the evolving challenges in international cricket, where player priorities are continually tested by the demands of multiple formats and competitions.