01 logo

The Gulf Ignites

U.S. and Israel Launch Strikes on Iran

By Riaz Gillani ExclusivePublished 7 months ago 3 min read
An Israeli fighter jet over the Gulf as tensions rise across the Middle East.

art writing...The United States, working closely with Israel, launched a series of precise airstrikes targeting Iran’s nuclear facilities in Fordow, Natanz, and Isfahan.

These strikes employed advanced bunker-buster bombs and Tomahawk missiles, resulting in significant structural damage—particularly at the Fordow site, which was almost completely destroyed.

Although Iran has officially denied any radioactive fallout resulting from these strikes, independent analysts and regional experts confirm that active conflict is now underway, with far-reaching implications that extend well beyond the immediate area.


ho Stands With Whom?

This conflict involves more than just the three main countries—United States, Israel, and Iran—it highlights a broader ideological and geopolitical divide across the globe.


llies of Israel and the United States include:

The United States itself, leading direct military operations and intelligence sharing.

The United Kingdom, providing vital intelligence and logistical support.

France, offering diplomatic support and possibly supplying arms.

Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates, quietly assisting by allowing the use of their airspace and logistical help.

Select NATO members who offer unofficial or silent backing.


ikely allies supporting Iran are:

Russia, which provides diplomatic backing and defense cooperation.

China, which maintains a strategic partnership with Iran and can leverage its position in the UN Security Council to block resolutions against Iran.

Proxy groups such as Hezbollah in Lebanon, the Houthi rebels in Yemen, and various Iraqi militias, who act as Iran’s regional agents.

Syria, which coordinates ground activities and provides safe passage to allied forces.

Turkey, whose position is complicated; while it may sympathize with Iran’s anti-Israel stance, it also balances diplomatic ties with the West.


amage and Realities on the Ground

The airstrikes have inflicted significant damage. Iranian official sources report at least 224 deaths and more than 1,800 injuries as a result.

Public anger and unrest have surged, but so far, Iran has avoided launching a full-scale military counterattack.

That said, Iran’s ballistic missile programs, drone operations, and extensive network of proxy forces remain largely intact and operational.

This suggests Iran could continue to engage in asymmetric warfare and possibly wage a prolonged proxy conflict across the region.


an the War Be Stopped? And How?

The fate of this conflict depends on several key factors:

Diplomatic efforts are ongoing, with the United Nations, China, and the European Union actively trying to mediate and reduce tensions.

Economic fallout is a major concern. Disruptions to oil supplies in the Gulf could have serious consequences for the global economy, possibly prompting intervention by other international powers.

Public pressure in the involved countries—particularly unrest within Iran, Israel, and the United States—may influence government policies and decisions regarding the war.

The nuclear threat remains a critical factor. If Iran feels its existence is at risk, the conflict could escalate beyond control.


egional Fallout

This war is already affecting neighboring countries. Jordan, Lebanon, and Iraq have expressed serious concerns over repeated airspace violations, an increasing influx of refugees, and growing political instability.

The deep-rooted sectarian tensions that exist in the region risk being inflamed further, which could trigger a wider wave of conflict across the Middle East.


edia and Disinformation

Alongside the military conflict, an information war is underway.

State-controlled media outlets in all involved nations are presenting conflicting narratives.

Social media platforms are flooded with misinformation, fake news, and AI-generated visuals, making it difficult to discern truth from propaganda.

The battle for control over public perception is nearly as intense as the fighting on the ground.


inning or Losing? No Simple Answer

This is not a straightforward conflict with clear winners or losers.

Israel and the U.S. currently possess superior military technology and firepower, but prolonged involvement could lead to political fatigue, economic strain, and growing domestic opposition.

Iran, on the other hand, may not match this conventional power but could still claim symbolic victories if it successfully uses proxy groups and asymmetric tactics to resist.


onclusion: A Choice Between Power and Peace

If this conflict drags on, it could fundamentally reshape the Middle East and affect global stability.

History has shown that war often results in devastating consequences.

However, it also teaches us that with diplomatic efforts, public pressure, and clear strategic goals, peace can be achieved even after the most intense conflicts.

Now, the world faces a critical decision: whether to continue down the dangerous path of power struggles and military confrontation or to pursue the more challenging but necessary path toward peace and stability.

historystartuptech newssocial media

About the Creator

Riaz Gillani Exclusive

Investigative writer & media analyst with 20+ years in journalism & 3+ years in global freelance reporting. Expert in political analysis, SEO writing, & legal content.

Reader insights

Be the first to share your insights about this piece.

How does it work?

Add your insights

Comments (2)

Sign in to comment
  • Donna Bobo7 months ago

    The U.S.-Israel strikes on Iran's nuclear sites sound intense. It's a complex conflict with multiple players on both sides. Tensions are bound to keep rising.

  • Md Peyel Hassan7 months ago

    folow

Find us on social media

Miscellaneous links

  • Explore
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Support

© 2026 Creatd, Inc. All Rights Reserved.