01 logo

Meta Must Be Held Accountable For The Unjust Banning of Accounts.

It Is a Time of Justice for Those of us Affected.

By Halden MilePublished 6 months ago 3 min read
Meta's various properties.

Meta owes those who were unjustly impacted by their wrongful account terminations big time.

On July 10th, 2025, I became one of many people greatly affected by Meta's widespread unjust account terminations. Here is what happened:

It all started for me when I received a message from Instagram stating the following:

Hi lord_shadrach,

Your Instagram account has been suspended. This is because your account, or activity on it, doesn't follow our Community Standards on s*****lization of children.

If you think we made a mistake, you have until January 6, 2026 to appeal.

I found this incredibly disturbing as in the years I've had both Facebook and Instagram, 2007 and 2016 respectively, never once have I EVER exploited anyone, especially children. After all, I used my Facebook to keep up with family and friends my Instagram largely for my amateur photography portfolio pertaining to food images.

So I appealed like any other person of this slanderous claim only to receive this:

We disabled your account, lord_shadrach

Hi lord_shadrach,

We reviewed your account and found that it still doesn’t follow our Community Standards. As a result, your account has been permanently disabled.

Learn how our Community Standards help keep the Instagram community an authentic and respectful place for people to express themselves.

As anyone can tell, I was incredibly distraught as I did nothing wrong. At no time did I ever once engage in anything related to exploitation of inappropriate behaviors. In response, I sent the following email:

Meta's banning of my Instagram and Facebook accounts were unjustified and baseless. Its claims of me exploiting ch******n is incredibly false and incorrect as I've never once engaged in anything related to such. All my accounts were used for were keeping up with family and posting images of food.

Your unjust banning of my accounts has me great stress and emotional turmoil as your claims were unfounded. This has also caused a major rift with my friends and family because of your unjust actions.

Based on information I've come across, it seems you've also unjustly banned various accounts as well. Accounts from countless people who depend on their social media accounts for business related purposes or for personal use. Yet, your unjust banning have been greatly disrupted their livelihoods because of the false claims and accusations of celebrity impersonation, terrorism, and child exploitation.

This is incredibly infuriating to not only me, but your userbase as well! I demand reinstatement!

I also decided to google anything that could help me. That's when I came across various other people who were affected by the same unjust account terminations as well.

According to my search, two articles written by the BBC, The Florida Times, Mashable, and countless other reputable news sources say that this has been an ongoing problem. So much in fact various reddit threads and a Change.org petition lead by an organization called People Over Platforms have been enacted to counter these false terminations and a lack of assistance from Meta regarding this matter. There is also an alleged civil lawsuit forming as a result of this.

Upon finding these links, I realized Meta's banning of my accounts were a serious problem. However, this does not exclude or exempt Meta from any wrong doing.

We the people, demand that Meta be held accountable for the unjust suspensions. We also ask that our wrongfully terminated accounts be fully restored as well. We also believe Meta should pay those affected restitution and any legal fees for the damages they've caused to the people who use their sites and services.

How much should Meta pay up considering the emotional and business opportunities lost because of these unjust terminations? Not to mention a heinous lack of support from its customer service which is reliant on A.I. Systems? Not $1 billion, not $10 billion, but $100 billion to the 30,000 people greatly affected by this tragic error plus any legal fees as well!

At a net worth of around $1.81 trillion, let's say Meta can afford it.

Let it be known that this amount should also cover the slanderous claims Meta made about those wrongfully being terminated for impersonation or exploitation as well.

Meta must take responsibility for the harm and trust it has caused its clients. These unjust terminations have caused great distress to those who used their platform and trusted Meta to the full extent in good faith. However, as a result of this recent ordeal, the people's trust in Meta, and its public image have suffered greatly.

We the people, demand justice, restoration, and restitution.

social mediatech newscybersecurity

About the Creator

Halden Mile

I am am American actor, author, Blogger, Cosplayer, Novelist, Poet, and Screenwriter.

Reader insights

Be the first to share your insights about this piece.

How does it work?

Add your insights

Comments (1)

Sign in to comment
  • Dire Deparra6 months ago

    Right now, I think what is keeping this movement from getting a lot of traction is the fact that most of its supporters have been banned from Meta platforms. I see that People Over Platforms has a FB page and an Instagram page, but those of us banned by Meta cannot interact with those pages (e.g., like, follow, comment, etc), so I don't think they will get much of any kind of momentum there. My Facebook account (which I had approx for the same amount of time as you) was suspended without warning a couple of months ago. Prior to joining Facebook, I had been active on other platforms like Tribe, MySpace, Livejournal, Deadjournal, Yahoo Groups, Yahoo Pager, ICQ, and then further back to pre-internet stuff like QuantumLink and local BBSes. (I've never been interested in the short-form platforms like Twitter, Instagram, etc. as they are inherently flawed by the short-form limitations and lack of important features). Over the past 10 to 15 years, Meta has basically acted like a cartel to effectively create a monopoly for itself. A lifetime's worth of contacts, friends, acquaintances, conversations, communities, etc. became almost exclusively, for better or for worse, funneled through Facebook and Messenger. When Meta suspended me, they didn't even give any reason. It was just done without warning, and with no chance of appeal (pressing their "appeal" button ≠ an actual appeal, and it doesn't take you to an appeal process; all it does is put your account at the front of the queue for immediate permanent suspension). It wasn't until a few minutes afterward that I got an e-mail stating that my account somehow violated community guidelines regarding "dangerous individuals and organizations", which is a guideline that is supposed to be about forbidding glorification or support of things like terrorist groups, drug cartels, genocidal regimes, etc. Of course they didn't actually inform me of what specific crime i had allegedly committed (i.e., what dangerous individual or group I supposedly glorified or supported, what actual post or image I had made that was guilty of such, etc.), because I NEVER DID ANY SUCH THING. I have never posted anything whatsoever that could even be slightly mistakenly construed to be supportive of any such groups or people. It is a basic human right of due process that when someone is accused of a crime, that they not be merely told what general law/rule/regulation/guideline they supposedly violated; they must be informed of the specific crime they are being accused of. And then evidence must be presented, and the accused must be allowed to present a defense. All of this MUST happen prior to judgement and sentencing. For there to be said that an "appeal" process actually exists, all that must occur beforehand, and then there actually has to be a process for someone to make an appeal, which by definition must allow for the person be allowed to freely voice their reasoning why judgement was unfair, and it must be read and considered by actual humans of authority. Facebook/Meta offers NONE OF THE ABOVE. You are accused, judged, and sentenced without being informed beforehand; not told the actual crime you were accused of and not presented with any evidence of said crime; and not allowed to present a defense. And there is no appeal process, just a placebo button fraudulently labeled "Appeal". Even if this button took you to a text field you could fill out, that would be read by a live human of authority, without being told of the specific crime and presented with the evidence of the crime, you can't defend yourself, let alone even begin to compose something that could be called an "appeal." Anyway, that's all besides the point... When my account was suspended, I was immediately cut off from 99% of everyone and everything I knew. Several hundred friends and relationships I had cultivated over a lifetime; dozens of communities i was a participant in; hundreds of artists, musicians, small businesses etc. that I followed and interacted with... Not to mention dozens of conversations I had going on in messenger... ALL STOLEN FROM ME BY META... And when this happens, from the perspective of all those contacts and groups, you are silently effectively erased from the platform history... you just disappear. Like when Stalin would have political opponents liquidated and then have official photographs edited to remove them, have all traces of their existence wiped from the planet, etc. You are basically UNPERSONED. If most of your friendships, relationships, communities, communications, etc. were via physical, in-person interactions and via personal platforms (e.g., family, local friends and groups, with all communication via phone, U.S. Mail, and e-mail), and you only used social media as something supplemental, then getting banned by Meta under false pretenses isn't such a terrible thing. You might even find it liberating. But if most of your friendships, relationships, communities, communications, etc. had become funneled through Facebook, Messenger, etc. to the point where you only kept a tiny fraction of your friend's phone numbers in your phone, then getting banned by Meta under false pretenses can be absolutely devastating. Especially if your life outside of social media platforms was already marginal because of health, economic, or other reasons. Because even when you are down and out, in a bad place in life, etc., if you at least still have your network of friends, acquaintances, etc. you have something essential that can help you continue to find a reason to continue existing. You can follow the lives of your friends and interact with them online; you can follow the happenings of all your favorite bands and artists and interact with them, stay informed of any new music they might release or shows they might be playing near you; you can stay active in online communities dedicated to subjects that are meaningful to you; you can post as little or as much as you want about your own life for your friends to see; you can create an event listing if you want to have a gathering or if you are actually running or participating in an event someplace that you would like to invite friends to, and your friends can do the same and invite you to their events; you can respond to people who need advice or assistance, or seek it yourself when needed..... etc. etc. It's enough to still provide a meaningful existence to someone who is mostly housebound or otherwise mostly isolated. But if you take all that away from someone, without any legitimate cause, and without warning, it can completely remove any reason they have to continue wanting to live.

Find us on social media

Miscellaneous links

  • Explore
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Support

© 2026 Creatd, Inc. All Rights Reserved.