Jeff Bezos Claims the 1-Hour Rule Boosts His Intelligence
Neuroscience Agrees
A great number of chief executive officers, such as Tim Cook of Apple and Indra Nooyi of Pepsi, brag about their rigorous morning rituals. It is not Jeff Bezos. It is well known that the founder of Amazon spends the first few hours of the day... putting holes on the golf course.
Bezos's morning practice of not using a screen
In a lecture that he gave at the Economic Club of Washington in 2018, Bezos described the typical morning routine that he typically follows. It consists of activities like reading the newspaper, spending time with his family over breakfast, and sipping coffee. Do you know what his "puttering time" does not include in its calculations? Looking at his mobile device.
In a recent interview with People, Lauren Sanchez, who is engaged to Bezos, revealed that her boyfriend continues to be dedicated to lazy mornings. She also said, "We don't get on our phones." In accordance with one of the rules,
Why has Bezos restricted screen time for the first hour after waking? It’s possible that his one-hour restriction is partially about personal choice. We’re all wired differently when it comes to our shifting energy levels and tolerance for stimulus, and experts claim we function best when our routines respect our individual cycles rather than resisting them.
But Bezos thinks his puttering doesn’t only help him appreciate life more. In the same 2018 address, he argued his slow-burn, phone-free mornings increase his energy levels and decision-making skills all day long.
The newest neurobiology says he’s on to something with this assertion. Less online mornings lead to wiser, healthier days, and new data strongly indicates more of us should borrow Bezos’s one-hour rule.
This is your brain on too much screen time.
“If you scrolled on your phone in bed for an hour just one morning, the negative impacts would be minimal. But if it becomes a habit, day after day, month after month, this behavior may take a toll,” Maris Loeffler, of the Stanford Lifestyle Medicine Program, explains in a recent blog post from the program.
Phones are a pervasive aspect of contemporary life. You can’t avoid them, and you may very easily overdo it. The Stanford piece puts together a series of very terrifying new discoveries from neuroscience on what happens when you spend too much time in front of a screen. They include:
- One research study demonstrating greater usage of screens among adults may affect learning, memory, and mental health.
- Another research indicated that those who watched TV for five hours or more each day had an elevated chance of acquiring brain-related disorders like dementia or Parkinson’s.
- Yet more research revealing that persons who participate in two or more hours of screen usage each day outside work had reduced gray matter capacity in their brains.
Adding to the harmful impacts on the brain, excessive screen time has also been related to eye issues, poor sleep, and back discomfort. All in all, it’s a rather bleak picture of what our communal phone fixation is doing to our brains and bodies.
“Passive screen time is like eating sugar but for your brain. It ‘tastes’ delicious, and you want it immediately, but you’re not truly feeding yourself. You’re not providing your brain any nutrition,” Loeffler sums up.
What to do in the morning instead of glancing at your phone
What is her and other experts’ main tip to help us all keep our screen usage within safe limits? None other than Bezos’s one-hour rule.
“Stanford Lifestyle Medicine experts recommend no screen time for the first hour of the day,” the blog post bluntly advises, presenting a menu of alternative activities that are healthier for your brain during the first hour of your day (I’ve provided links to further information about the advantages of each):
- Exercise
- Call a friend or family member.
- Prepare a nutritious breakfast.
- Meditate
- Listen to music
- Create a gratitude list
- Read a book
- Spend time outdoors and get dawn light.
“How do you want your day’s energy and mood to start?” Loeffler asks. “Intentionally implementing a morning routine that reflects lifestyle medicine choices instead of screen time sets a positive tone for the day and supports brain health and cognitive enhancement.”
Which would come as no surprise to Jeff Bezos. He’s been applying neuroscience’s best practices for a brain-boosting morning routine for years. Maybe more of us should put down our phones in the morning and do the same.
About the Creator
Iron-Pen☑️
I hold an unending passion for words, with every letter carrying a piece of my soul. Each story is a journey to explore myself and the world. I aim to be a voice for the voiceless and sow seeds of hope and change in readers' hearts.
Keep reading
More stories from Iron-Pen☑️ and writers in 01 and other communities.
AI Has Reached Its Breaking Point
Several research and AI specialists have pointed to the fact that the quantity of training data, processing power, and energy utilization would need to expand dramatically. But it just isn’t doable, and even back in April, OpenAI and other generative AI startups looked to already be butting up against severe restrictions in these areas. However, subsequent reporting, interviews, and research have now officially proven what I and many others expected. What this implies for the AI business and the economy at large might be disastrous. These stories came from The Information and Reuters. The Information released a piece revealing how their next text AI, dubbed Orion, is just modestly better than their existing Chat GPT-4o model despite utilizing a significantly bigger training dataset. The magazine reported that “some researchers at the company believe Orion isn’t reliably better than its predecessor in handling certain tasks” and that “Orion performs better at language tasks but may not outperform previous models at tasks such as coding.” According to The Information, Orion attained GPT-4 levels of competence after being taught on only 20% of its training material but scarcely progressed after that. Because AI training approaches have reportedly hit a stalemate in recent years, we may make an informed judgment that this implies Orion has a training dataset five times bigger than GPT-4, but it is not appreciably better. This nicely shows and verifies the diminishing returns problem. To drive this concern home even harder, Reuters interviewed the newly fired OpenAI co-founder, Ilya Sutskever. In the interview, Sutskever said that the firm’s latest experiments aiming to scale up its models show that such efforts had plateaued. As far as he is concerned, AI cannot grow better by merely giving it more data. Recent findings also corroborate with Sutskever and explain why Orion is ultimately a bit crap. One of these research indicated that when AI models are given more data and develop bigger, they don’t get widely better but gain better at specialized tasks at the expense of their wider usefulness. You can see this in OpenAI’s o1 model, which is bigger than GPT-4o and is better at solving mathematical problems but is not as good at writing effectively. You may also see this with Tesla’s FSD. As the program became stronger at managing increasingly complicated traffic difficulties, it apparently started to lose fundamental driving abilities and began to curb corners. Yet another business determined that, at their present pace, generative AI companies like OpenAI would run out of high-quality new data to construct their AIs on by 2026! As such, making AIs better by merely expanding these models bigger won’t be a feasible choice in the very near future. Indeed, others have speculated that the reason Orion is underperforming is because OpenAI can’t gather enough data to make it any better than GPT-4o. But, any way, this demonstrates that the predictions of generative AI suddenly stalling have come true. There are several answers to this, such improving how AIs are created to decrease the training data required, operating numerous AIs simultaneously, or introducing new computational architecture to make AI infrastructure significantly more efficient. However, all of these ideas are in their infancy and are years away from becoming deployable. What’s more, these solutions merely push this problem down the road, since all they do is make AI slightly more efficient with its energy and data, and they also don’t tackle the question of where these corporations will obtain more fresh, high-quality data in the future. So, why does this matter? Well, big tech has put billions of dollars on AI on the premise that it would become exponentially better and be massively lucrative in the future. Sadly however, we now know that just won’t happen. Take OpenAI. A few months ago, it was forecast to report a $5 billion yearly deficit and even face bankruptcy. Even worse, the AIs that it did release aren’t lucrative despite hundreds of millions of users. So even if OpenAI didn’t spend a dime on generating any new models, it would still plummet. Yet, even despite this, it was able to secure several billion dollars in credit and an additional $6.6 billion in fresh capital, giving the artificial intelligence business a stunning $157 billion value and preserving it from collapse. However, given their present pace of loss and development expenditures, this is just enough to save them from desolation for another year. This, paired with the officially certified severely falling profits, implies that some of the largest and most prominent industries and biggest investment companies in the world are supporting a fundamentally defective product. The last time our economy did this, it generated one of the biggest financial crises in living memory: the credit crisis of 2008.
By Iron-Pen☑️ about a year ago in 01
What Makes OTC Trading Platforms Different From Regular Exchanges
Crypto trading is often associated with public exchanges where prices, order books, and trade volumes are visible to everyone. While this model works well for retail traders and small transactions, it is not always suitable for large or sensitive trades. This is where OTC crypto trading platforms come into play. OTC, or over-the-counter trading, follows a very different structure compared to regular exchanges. Understanding these differences helps traders, institutions, and businesses choose the right trading environment for their needs.
By smithtaylor7 days ago in 01
How Do I Remove an Emoji From Saved Photos?
While retouching our social media photographs, we may add smiley faces, stamps, and icons to enhance additional entertaining or cover up confidential elements. However, occasionally we fail to recover the actual photograph and immediately explore a technique to wipe emoticons, smiley faces, stamps, and other components from the modified photograph.
By Intelligent Creator5 days ago in 01
Bruce Lee and The God of War: Kuan Ti
It starts with love.. The Power to the God Of War and Wealth Walk into a Chinese restaurant (even in Oklahoma, USA), a Chinese police station, a kung fu martial arts studio or even a Chinese temple and you often see a red faced warrior holding a heavy quan-do (spear like weapon).
By WILD WAYNE : The Dragon King5 days ago in Chapters
Comments
There are no comments for this story
Be the first to respond and start the conversation.