Green or Greed?

Is climate change truly a global crisis—or just the perfect political weapon?

Climate change dominates headlines, policy discussions, and even daily conversations. But what if much of what we hear has been filtered, exaggerated, or even manipulated? In Escrologie, a controversial French book by YouTuber and political commentator Aldo Sterone, the author claims that environmental policies are less about saving the planet and more about controlling people and redistributing power. This article summarizes Escrologie for English-speaking readers and invites you to ask: is the climate crisis a problem with a solution—or just another ideological battlefield?

In Escrologie, Aldo Sterone doesn’t deny the climate is changing. What he questions is the response. According to him, the green agenda has turned into a gold mine for some and a nightmare for many. He accuses political elites of exploiting ecological concerns to impose regulations that damage economies, destroy industries, and penalize the working class—all under the banner of environmentalism. Sterone’s main argument? Ecology has become a smokescreen for opportunism.

One of the most striking examples he shares is the case of Volkswagen, forced to meet strict emissions standards while still relying heavily on energy from countries like China. Sterone highlights what he sees as hypocrisy: how can Europe call itself “green” while outsourcing pollution to nations with weaker environmental laws? This phenomenon, known in economic terms as “carbon leakage,” is a critical but under-discussed consequence of current climate policies. The keyword here—green hypocrisy—perfectly captures the dilemma. Are we really reducing emissions, or just moving them out of sight?

Another key point in Escrologie focuses on failed eco-projects. Sterone points to the infamous “solar road” launched in France, once hailed as a revolutionary step toward clean energy. Instead, it turned out to be an expensive flop, plagued by maintenance issues and low efficiency. He also criticizes large-scale investments in solar panels in cloudy countries like the UK, arguing that political vanity often outweighs scientific evidence in decision-making. The secondary keyword here—eco failures—is an increasingly relevant theme as voters demand accountability for green spending.

The book also dives into how green policies affect everyday citizens. Sterone claims that the costs of ecological reforms are unfairly borne by the poor and middle class. From taxes on fuel to bans on wood-burning stoves in rural areas, it’s often those with the fewest resources who suffer the most. Meanwhile, he suggests that wealthy elites continue to fly private jets and build energy-hungry mansions without consequence. This leads to the concept of climate elitism, a term gaining traction among those who feel environmentalism has been hijacked by those in power.

What makes Escrologie so compelling—and controversial—is its tone. Sterone mixes data, anecdote, and rhetoric with a sharp, almost cinematic flair. Reading the book feels like watching a political thriller, where nothing is quite what it seems and everyone has something to gain. He paints a picture of a green movement no longer rooted in science or citizen wellbeing, but in ideological warfare and financial gain. His storytelling invites both skepticism and reflection—whether you agree with his conclusions or not.

To be clear: Sterone is not calling for climate denial. He acknowledges environmental challenges, but he believes solutions must be grounded in honesty, realism, and genuine concern for people—not ideology or profit. He urges readers to distinguish between environmental science and environmental politics. And that’s perhaps the most important takeaway from Escrologie: not to abandon the climate conversation, but to reclaim it.

Is Escrologie a wake-up call or a cynical distraction? That’s up to you. But as climate policies continue to shape our future, this book serves as a reminder that the green movement—like any movement—is not immune to exploitation. The stakes are high, and the consequences are real.

So, what do you think? Is climate change a challenge we must urgently fix, or has it become the ultimate political weapon? Share your thoughts in the comments—because the climate debate is far from over.