01 logo

Google Ordered to Pay $32.5 Million in Patent Infringement Case

A Setback for Smart Speaker Technology

By Todor TodorovskiPublished 3 years ago 3 min read
Google Ordered to Pay $32.5 Million in Patent Infringement Case
Photo by Greg Bulla on Unsplash

In a significant blow to smart speaker technology, Google has been ordered to pay Sonos $32.5 million for infringing on the company's smart speaker patent. The verdict, which emerged from a legal battle that began in 2020, signifies a setback for Google's reputation in the industry.

The dispute originated when Sonos accused Google of copying its patented multiroom audio technology, following their collaboration in 2013. Sonos alleged that Google's smart speakers and media players infringed on one of their patents, leading to the legal confrontation.

During the trial, the jury sided with Sonos, concluding that Google had indeed infringed on the patent in question. This ruling underscores the importance of respecting intellectual property rights and reinforces the need for companies to develop their products without encroaching on existing patents.

The legal battle took an unexpected turn when Google counter-sued Sonos in August of the previous year, claiming that the audio company had infringed on their own smart speakers and voice control technology. However, the recent jury verdict emphasizes Sonos' position and highlights Google's alleged pattern of infringing on Sonos' patent portfolio.

Sonos welcomed the jury's decision, expressing gratitude and affirming the value of their invention of zone scenes. The company believes that Google infringes on more than 200 of their patents, and they continue to seek fair compensation for the technologies Google has incorporated.

Although the jury ruled in favor of Sonos regarding the infringement, they did not find Google's Home app to violate a separate patent filed by Sonos.

This ruling serves as a setback for Google, not only in terms of the financial penalty but also in regard to the reputation of its smart speaker technology. The outcome underscores the importance of respecting intellectual property rights within the technology industry and highlights the need for companies to innovate independently without infringing on existing patents.

The Sonos vs. Google case is not an isolated incident in the technology industry. Over the years, several high-profile patent infringement disputes have unfolded, shaping the legal landscape surrounding intellectual property rights. Here are a few notable cases:

Apple vs. Samsung:

Perhaps one of the most well-known patent battles involved Apple and Samsung. The legal feud began in 2011 when Apple accused Samsung of copying the design and functionality of its iPhone and iPad. The protracted legal battle spanned multiple countries and resulted in several victories and defeats for both parties. In 2018, the companies reached a settlement, ending their long-standing patent disputes.

BlackBerry vs. Typo Products LLC:

In 2014, BlackBerry filed a lawsuit against Typo Products LLC, a company co-founded by Ryan Seacrest. BlackBerry claimed that Typo's smartphone keyboard accessory infringed on its patented keyboard design. The court ruled in favor of BlackBerry, issuing an injunction to halt Typo's sales of the infringing product.

Nokia vs. HTC:

In 2012, Nokia filed multiple patent infringement lawsuits against HTC, alleging that HTC's smartphones infringed on its patents related to wireless communication technology. The legal battle resulted in a settlement in 2013, with HTC agreeing to pay licensing fees to Nokia.

The Sonos vs. Google case joins a growing list of patent infringement disputes that have shaped the technology industry. Such legal battles underscore the importance of respecting intellectual property rights, fostering innovation, and protecting the investments made by companies in developing groundbreaking technologies.

As Google contemplates its next steps following the Sonos verdict, the impact of this case is expected to reverberate throughout the smart speaker industry. It serves as a reminder for companies to navigate patent laws carefully and innovate independently without infringing on existing patents. Additionally, it highlights the significance of establishing licensing agreements and partnerships to ensure the lawful use of patented technologies.

In an increasingly competitive and innovative landscape, protecting intellectual property rights remains crucial for fostering technological advancement and fair market competition. As technology continues to evolve, it is imperative for companies to prioritize ethical practices and respect the intellectual property of others.

By upholding the principles of intellectual property rights, the technology industry can continue to drive innovation and deliver new and exciting products to consumers while fostering an environment of healthy competition and respect for intellectual property.

tech news

About the Creator

Todor Todorovski

Reader insights

Be the first to share your insights about this piece.

How does it work?

Add your insights

Comments

There are no comments for this story

Be the first to respond and start the conversation.

Sign in to comment

    Find us on social media

    Miscellaneous links

    • Explore
    • Contact
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms of Use
    • Support

    © 2026 Creatd, Inc. All Rights Reserved.